BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38572267)

  • 1. The overturn of
    Nohria A; Desai D; Klein EJ; Senna MM; Aguh C; Farah RS; Bordone L; Krueger LD; Mesinkovska N; Cummins D; Lo Sicco KI
    Int J Womens Dermatol; 2024 Jun; 10(2):e139. PubMed ID: 38572267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Interest in Permanent Contraception Peaked Following the Leaked Supreme Court Majority Opinion of Roe vs. Wade: A Cross-Sectional Google Trends Analysis.
    Ghomeshi A; Diaz P; Henry V; Ramasamy R; Masterson TA
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30582. PubMed ID: 36420253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isotretinoin, Vitamin A Supplements, and Unintended Pregnancies in Post Roe v. Wade America.
    Paidisetty PS; Wang LK; Zamil DH; Fu S; Nawas ZY
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31442. PubMed ID: 36523684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mental Distress Among Female Individuals of Reproductive Age and Reported Barriers to Legal Abortion Following the US Supreme Court Decision to Overturn Roe v Wade.
    Dave D; Fu W; Yang M
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234509. PubMed ID: 36951866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
    Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Challenging the US Supreme Court's Majority Ruling on
    Berer M
    Health Hum Rights; 2023 Jun; 25(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 37397425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
    Mcfarlane DR
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Impact of Overturn of Roe v Wade Ruling.
    Bhardwaj A; Fedson S; Munagala M; Pinney S; Rajapreyar I; Mancini D
    JACC Heart Fail; 2023 Mar; 11(3):362-364. PubMed ID: 36889883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teratogenic, unregulated, vitamin A acne supplements, and Roe v Wade: Response to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology".
    Zamil DH; Wang LK; Paidisetty PS; Asad U; Ren V
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e289. PubMed ID: 36780948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
    Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Implications of the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn Roe v Wade for Women With Pregnancy-Associated Cancers.
    Silverstein J; Van Loon K
    JAMA Oncol; 2022 Oct; 8(10):1394-1395. PubMed ID: 35951314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy.
    Kim JH; Gunderson A; Lane EA; Bauer NM
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):569-592. PubMed ID: 36693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. People v. Frey.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.
    Buyuker BE; LaRoche KJ; Bueno X; Jozkowski KN; Crawford BL; Turner RC; Lo WJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):649-678. PubMed ID: 36693179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.