These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38573104)

  • 1. Comparing Self-Consistent
    Wen M; Abraham V; Harsha G; Shee A; Whaley KB; Zgid D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Apr; 20(8):3109-3120. PubMed ID: 38573104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-Component
    Förster A; van Lenthe E; Spadetto E; Visscher L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Sep; 19(17):5958-5976. PubMed ID: 37594901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities of Acceptor Molecules III: A Benchmark of GW Methods.
    Knight JW; Wang X; Gallandi L; Dolgounitcheva O; Ren X; Ortiz JV; Rinke P; Körzdörfer T; Marom N
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Feb; 12(2):615-26. PubMed ID: 26731609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the
    Wang Y; Rinke P; Ren X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Aug; 17(8):5140-5154. PubMed ID: 34319724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An optimally tuned range-separated hybrid starting point for ab initio GW plus Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations of molecules.
    McKeon CA; Hamed SM; Bruneval F; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Aug; 157(7):074103. PubMed ID: 35987597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vertex effects in describing the ionization energies of the first-row transition-metal monoxide molecules.
    Wang Y; Ren X
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Dec; 157(21):214115. PubMed ID: 36511552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertex Corrections to the Polarizability Do Not Improve the GW Approximation for the Ionization Potential of Molecules.
    Lewis AM; Berkelbach TC
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 May; 15(5):2925-2932. PubMed ID: 30933508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmark of GW Approaches for the GW100 Test Set.
    Caruso F; Dauth M; van Setten MJ; Rinke P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Oct; 12(10):5076-5087. PubMed ID: 27631585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking the GW Approximation and Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Groups IB and IIB Atoms and Monoxides.
    Hung L; Bruneval F; Baishya K; Öğüt S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 May; 13(5):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 28387124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate Absolute and Relative Core-Level Binding Energies from
    Golze D; Keller L; Rinke P
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 Mar; 11(5):1840-1847. PubMed ID: 32043890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    Mejia-Rodriguez D; Kunitsa AA; Fulton JL; Aprà E; Govind N
    J Phys Chem A; 2023 Nov; 127(46):9684-9694. PubMed ID: 37938891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GW in the Gaussian and Plane Waves Scheme with Application to Linear Acenes.
    Wilhelm J; Del Ben M; Hutter J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):3623-35. PubMed ID: 27348184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-Range Corrected DFT Meets GW: Vibrationally Resolved Photoelectron Spectra from First Principles.
    Gallandi L; Körzdörfer T
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Nov; 11(11):5391-400. PubMed ID: 26894242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully Dynamic
    Bruneval F; Förster A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Apr; 20(8):3218-3230. PubMed ID: 38603811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GW100: Benchmarking G0W0 for Molecular Systems.
    van Setten MJ; Caruso F; Sharifzadeh S; Ren X; Scheffler M; Liu F; Lischner J; Lin L; Deslippe JR; Louie SG; Yang C; Weigend F; Neaton JB; Evers F; Rinke P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Dec; 11(12):5665-87. PubMed ID: 26642984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerically Precise Benchmark of Many-Body Self-Energies on Spherical Atoms.
    Vacondio S; Varsano D; Ruini A; Ferretti A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):3703-3717. PubMed ID: 35561415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-Space Based Benchmark of G
    Gao W; Chelikowsky JR
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Oct; 15(10):5299-5307. PubMed ID: 31424933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Full self-consistency versus quasiparticle self-consistency in diagrammatic approaches: exactly solvable two-site Hubbard model.
    Kutepov AL
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2015 Aug; 27(31):315603. PubMed ID: 26199232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaussian-based quasiparticle self-consistent GW for periodic systems.
    Lei J; Zhu T
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Dec; 157(21):214114. PubMed ID: 36511534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing GW Approaches for Predicting Core Level Binding Energies.
    van Setten MJ; Costa R; Viñes F; Illas F
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Feb; 14(2):877-883. PubMed ID: 29320628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.