134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38574653)
1. The Meat Standards Australia carcass grading site affects assessment of marbling and prediction of meat-eating quality in growing European beef cattle.
Santinello M; Rampado N; Penasa M; Hocquette JF; Pethick D; De Marchi M
Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 213():109501. PubMed ID: 38574653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are Marbling and the Prediction of Beef Eating Quality Affected by Different Grading Sites?
Liu J; Pogorzelski G; Neveu A; Legrand I; Pethick D; Ellies-Oury MP; Hocquette JF
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():611153. PubMed ID: 33855054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage.
Stewart SM; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Pethick DW; Polkinghorne R; Thompson JM; Tarr G
Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108322. PubMed ID: 33067083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between European carcass evaluation and Meat Standards Australia grading scheme applied to young beef cattle.
Santinello M; Penasa M; Goi A; Rampado N; Hocquette JF; De Marchi M
Meat Sci; 2024 Jun; 216():109575. PubMed ID: 38943842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European conformation and fat scores of bovine carcasses are not good indicators of marbling.
Liu J; Chriki S; Ellies-Oury MP; Legrand I; Pogorzelski G; Wierzbicki J; Farmer L; Troy D; Polkinghorne R; Hocquette JF
Meat Sci; 2020 Dec; 170():108233. PubMed ID: 32688221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between visual marbling score and chemical intramuscular fat with camera marbling percentage in Australian beef carcasses.
Stewart SM; Gardner GE; Williams A; Pethick DW; McGilchrist P; Kuchida K
Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108369. PubMed ID: 33261986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality.
McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1750-1757. PubMed ID: 30724139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?
Packer DT; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
Animal; 2021 May; 15(5):100196. PubMed ID: 34029795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective grading of eye muscle area, intramuscular fat and marbling in Australian beef and lamb.
Stewart SM; Lauridsen T; Toft H; Pethick DW; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Christensen M
Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108358. PubMed ID: 33160745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2434-2442. PubMed ID: 29606159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability.
Hocquette JF; Van Wezemael L; Chriki S; Legrand I; Verbeke W; Farmer L; Scollan ND; Polkinghorne R; Rødbotten R; Allen P; Pethick DW
Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 24035246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Across countries implementation of handheld near-infrared spectrometer for the on-line prediction of beef marbling in slaughterhouse.
Kombolo-Ngah M; Goi A; Santinello M; Rampado N; Atanassova S; Liu J; Faure P; Thoumy L; Neveu A; Andueza D; De Marchi M; Hocquette JF
Meat Sci; 2023 Jun; 200():109169. PubMed ID: 37001445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective grading of rib eye traits using the Q-FOM™ camera in Australian beef carcasses.
Stewart SM; Toft H; O'Reilly RA; Lauridsen T; Esberg J; Jørgensen TB; Tarr G; Christensen M
Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 213():109500. PubMed ID: 38582006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. French consumer evaluation of eating quality of Angus x Salers beef: Effects of muscle cut, muscle slicing and ageing.
Liu J; Pannier L; Ellies-Oury MP; Legrand I; Noel F; Sepchat B; Prache S; Pethick D; Hocquette JF
Meat Sci; 2023 Mar; 197():109079. PubMed ID: 36563497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adding value to beef portion steaks through measuring individual marbling.
Pannier L; van de Weijer TM; van der Steen FTHJ; Kranenbarg R; Gardner GE
Meat Sci; 2023 Oct; 204():109279. PubMed ID: 37467681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of ossification from live and carcass traits in young beef cattle: model development and evaluation.
Gudex BW; McPhee MJ; Oddy VH; Walmsley BJ
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):144-155. PubMed ID: 30388230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. European conformation and fat scores have no relationship with eating quality.
Bonny SP; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF; Gardner GE
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):996-1006. PubMed ID: 26755183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strategies to predict and improve eating quality of cooked beef using carcass and meat composition traits in Angus cattle.
Mateescu RG; Oltenacu PA; Garmyn AJ; Mafi GG; VanOverbeke DL
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2160-71. PubMed ID: 27285712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
