These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3857555)

  • 1. Two-year clinical evaluation of a proprietary composite resin for the restoration of primary posterior teeth.
    Roberts MW; Broring CL; Moffa JP
    Pediatr Dent; 1985 Mar; 7(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 3857555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth.
    Nelson GV; Osborne JW; Gale EN; Norman RD; Phillips RW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 6934175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of composite and amalgam in posterior teeth of children.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Dent Mater; 1987 Aug; 3(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 3481593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: two year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 49(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 6344966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars.
    de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
    Olmez A; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite restorations for primary molars: two-year results.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Pediatr Dent; 1985 Jun; 7(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 3859848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simplified and rapid treatment of ankylosed primary molars with an amalgam and composite resin.
    Bonin M
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1976; 43(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 773976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Composite resin restoration in posterior teeth. I. The trial manufacture of beveling burs for the composite resin cavity].
    Futatsuki M; Hirota K; Takita K; Hamano Y; Nakata M
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1985; 23(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 3869310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A thirty months clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin in primary molars.
    Cunha RF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 11314318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restorative material for children's teeth: preferences of parents and children.
    Peretz B; Ram D
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):243-8, 233. PubMed ID: 12613305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of amalgam restorations in deciduous teeth].
    Papagiannoulis L; Patelarou N; Vougiouklakis G
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1985; 39(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 3939458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.