These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38575839)
21. [Comparison of two kinds of methods evaluating the degree of facial asymmetry by three-dimensional data]. Xiong YX; Yang HF; Zhao YJ; Wang Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 47(2):340-3. PubMed ID: 25882957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The primal sagittal plane of the head: a new concept. Gateno J; Jajoo A; Nicol M; Xia JJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 45(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 26708049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of facial symmetry after jaw reconstruction surgery. Duchscherer J; Aalto D; Westover L Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Aug; 24(11):1212-1220. PubMed ID: 33459032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study. Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of Surgery-First Approach in Treating Skeletal Dentofacial Asymmetry with Orthognathic Surgery. Chen Z; Zhong Y; Li B; Ma H; Lei B; Yang B J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Sep; 34(6):1817-1821. PubMed ID: 37276330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A mathematical algorithm of the facial symmetry plane: Application to mandibular deformity 3D facial data. Zhu Y; Fu X; Zhang L; Zheng S; Wen A; Xiao N; Wang Y; Zhao Y J Anat; 2022 Mar; 240(3):556-566. PubMed ID: 34841516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Construction and validity of a midsagittal plane based on the symmetry of a 3-dimensional model of the relevant cranial base. Feng B; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Yu M; Wang H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e49-e58. PubMed ID: 33357762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry. Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of hard and soft tissue prediction using three-dimensional simulation software in bimaxillary osteotomies: A systematic review. Tabchi Y; Zaoui F; Bahoum A Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100802. PubMed ID: 37499444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selection of a horizontal reference plane in 3D evaluation: Identifying facial asymmetry and occlusal cant in orthognathic surgery planning. Lonic D; Sundoro A; Lin HH; Lin PJ; Lo LJ Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2157. PubMed ID: 28526831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in borderline class III malocclusion: a systematic review. Alhammadi MS; Almashraqi AA; Khadhi AH; Arishi KA; Alamir AA; Beleges EM; Halboub E Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Nov; 26(11):6443-6455. PubMed ID: 36098813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison. Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation. Abrigo JM; Fountain DM; Provenzale JM; Law EK; Kwong JS; Hart MG; Tam WWS Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011551. PubMed ID: 29357120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation. Lin H; Zhu P; Lin Q; Huang X; Xu Y; Yang X PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161601. PubMed ID: 27571364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach to Correct Facial Asymmetry: Artificial Intelligence-Based Cephalometric Analysis. Choi JW; Park H; Kim B S IH; Kim N; Kwon SM; Lee JY Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):496e-499e. PubMed ID: 35196690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional Analysis and Evaluation in Orthognathic Surgical Cases with Facial Asymmetry. Kogou T; Takaki T; Shibahara T Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(3):147-161. PubMed ID: 30224609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated segmentation and measurement of the female pelvic floor from the mid-sagittal plane of 3D ultrasound volumes. Szentimrey Z; Ameri G; Hong CX; Cheung RYK; Ukwatta E; Eltahawi A Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6215-6227. PubMed ID: 36964964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Cornelis MA; Tepedino M; Riis NV; Niu X; Cattaneo PM Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jan; 43(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 32815989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]