161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38575912)
21. Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system.
Alqahtani S; Wei C; Zhang Y; Szewczyk-Bieda M; Wilson J; Huang Z; Nabi G
Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7722. PubMed ID: 32382097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biopsy-Integrated 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modeling of Prostate Cancer and Its Application for Gleason Grade and Tumor Laterality Assessment.
Kim J; Lim B; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Go H; Cho YM; Park KJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Feb; 147(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 35512234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Refining the risk-stratification of transrectal biopsy-detected prostate cancer by elastic fusion registration transperineal biopsies.
Covin B; Roumiguié M; Quintyn-Ranty ML; Graff P; Khalifa J; Aziza R; Ploussard G; Portalez D; Malavaud B
World J Urol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):269-275. PubMed ID: 30145777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology-Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help?
Calio BP; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Maruf M; Jain AL; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):976-982. PubMed ID: 29154904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Velez E; Fedorov A; Tuncali K; Olubiyi O; Allard CB; Kibel AS; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2154-2159. PubMed ID: 28293720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance.
Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combination MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy may overestimate gleason grade on final surgical pathology and impact risk stratification.
Yu A; Yamany T; Mojtahed A; Hanna N; Nicaise E; Harisinghani M; Wu CL; Dahl DM; Wszolek M; Blute ML; Feldman AS
Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):59.e1-59.e5. PubMed ID: 34544650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Beyersdorff D; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Falkenbach F; Tilki D; Maurer T; Sauter G; Graefen M; Leyh-Bannurah SR
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 36184537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy - A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen.
Guimarães T; Gil M; Medeiros M; Andrade V; Guerra J; Pinheiro H; Fernandes F; Pina J; Lopes Dias J; Campos Pinheiro L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Sep; 94(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 36165470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A predictive model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for improved risk assessment and selection of biopsy-naïve men for prostate biopsies.
Boesen L; Thomsen FB; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thomsen HS; Jakobsen H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 30988407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy.
Arsov C; Becker N; Rabenalt R; Hiester A; Quentin M; Dietzel F; Antoch G; Gabbert HE; Albers P; Schimmöller L
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 141(11):2061-8. PubMed ID: 26013424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.
Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.
Boesen L; Noergaard N; Chabanova E; Logager V; Balslev I; Mikines K; Thomsen HS
Scand J Urol; 2015 Feb; 49(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 24922550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
