BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38577068)

  • 1. Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection for T4b rectal cancer: A 9-year review.
    Chan KS; Liu B; Tan MNA; How KY; Wong KY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 16(3):777-789. PubMed ID: 38577068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perioperative and oncological outcomes following robotic en bloc multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer.
    DiBrito SR; Manisundaram N; Kim Y; Peacock O; Hu CY; Bednarski B; You YN; Uppal A; Tillman M; Konishi T; Kaur H; Palmquist S; Holliday E; Dasari A; Chang GJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2024 May; 26(5):949-957. PubMed ID: 38576073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excisions: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort study of 5-year survival outcomes.
    Duhoky R; Rutgers MLW; Burghgraef TA; Stefan S; Masum S; Piozzi GN; Sagias F; Khan JS
    Ann Surg Open; 2024 Jun; 5(2):e404. PubMed ID: 38911658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proficiency-based progression training in robot-assisted laparoscopy for endometrial cancer: peri-operative and survival outcomes from an observational cohort study.
    Sickinghe A; Nobbenhuis M; Nelissen E; Heath O; Ind T
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1370836. PubMed ID: 38903811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Rates between Patients Who Underwent Robotic and Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-Sided Colon Cancer.
    Aghayeva A; Seker ME; Bayrakceken S; Kirbiyik E; Bagda A; Benlice C; Karahasanoglu T; Baca B
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38899434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic versus laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen YC; Tsai YY; Ke TW; Shen MY; Fingerhut A; Chen WT
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38816620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancers: A Single-Center Experience.
    Muhammed SH; Asad NM; Dewana AM; Ahmed BS; Al-Dabbagh A
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58849. PubMed ID: 38784322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers.
    Rogier-Mouzelas F; Piquard A; Karam E; Dussart D; Michot N; Saint-Marc O; Thebault B; Artus A; Bucur P; Pabst-Giger U; Salame E; Ouaissi M
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38789622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis: the robotic approach.
    Kinny-Köster B; Walsh CM; Sun Z; Faghih M; Desai NM; Warren DS; Kalyani RR; Roberts C; Singh VK; Makary MA; He J
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38844730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of proficiency in conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer on the introduction of robotic surgery.
    Iguchi K; Numata M; Sugiyama A; Saito K; Atsumi Y; Kazama K; Sugano N; Sato T; Rino Y; Saito A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Jun; 409(1):189. PubMed ID: 38896303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decade of experience with 530 minimally invasive robotic hepatectomies from a single tertiary hepatobiliary center: analysis of short-term outcomes and oncologic survival.
    Christodoulou M; Pattilachan TM; Ross SB; Lingamaneni G; Sucandy I
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38821208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
    Cheong C; Kim NK
    Indian J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 8(4):591-599. PubMed ID: 29203993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus open and laparoscopic pelvic exenterations for pelvic cancer: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis in Japan.
    Yatabe Y; Hanaoka M; Hanazawa R; Hirakawa A; Mukai T; Kimura K; Yamanoi K; Kono J; Yokota M; Takahashi H; Kobayashi A; Kobayashi K; Ichikawa N; Yasui M; Nakane K; Yamamoto M; Takenaka A; Nakamura Y; Takemasa I; Yabusaki N; Akamoto S; Tatarano S; Murata K; Manabe T; Fujimura T; Kawamura M; Egi H; Yamaguchi S; Terai Y; Inoue S; Ito A; Kinugasa Y
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined Robotic and Vaginal Surgery for Pelvic Exenteration due to Vaginal Sarcoma Relapse in an Obese Woman.
    Perrone AM; Ferla S; Tesei M; Mezzapesa F; De Leo A; Schiavina R; De Iaco P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38866099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Natarajan P; Delanerolle G; Dobson L; Xu C; Zeng Y; Yu X; Marston K; Phan T; Choi F; Barzilova V; Powell SG; Wyatt J; Taylor S; Shi JQ; Hapangama DK
    Cancers (Basel); 2024 May; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 38791939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic
    Song L; Xu WQ; Wei ZQ; Tang G
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 May; 16(5):1280-1290. PubMed ID: 38817290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic living donor hepatectomy is associated with superior outcomes for both the donor and the recipient compared with laparoscopic or open - A single-center prospective registry study of 3448 cases.
    Raptis DA; Elsheikh Y; Alnemary Y; Marquez KAH; Bzeizi K; Alghamdi S; Alabbad S; Alqahtani SA; Troisi RI; Boehnert MU; Malago M; Wu YM; Broering DC;
    Am J Transplant; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38723867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal malignancy in obese patients: a propensity score-weighted cohort study.
    Hsu YJ; Yu YL; Jhuang JR; You JF; Liao CK; Tsai WS; Pan YP; Chern YJ
    Int J Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.