These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38577221)

  • 1. Reversing the reversed congruency effect: directional salience overrides social significance in a spatial Stroop task.
    Tanaka Y; Okubo M
    Iperception; 2024; 15(2):20416695241238692. PubMed ID: 38577221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are eyes special? Gaze, but not pointing gestures, elicits a reversed congruency effect in a spatial Stroop task.
    Dalmaso M; Galfano G; Castelli L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2547-2552. PubMed ID: 37587354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects.
    Narganes-Pineda C; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J; Marotta A
    Psychol Res; 2023 Feb; 87(1):242-259. PubMed ID: 35192045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye gaze is not unique: The reversed congruency effect on gaze and tongue targets.
    Tanaka Y; Ishikawa K; Oyama T; Okubo M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jul; 77(7):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 37705449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What gaze adds to arrows: Changes in attentional response to gaze versus arrows in childhood and adolescence.
    Aranda-Martín B; Ballesteros-Duperón MÁ; Lupiáñez J
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):718-738. PubMed ID: 34997569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arrows don't look at you: Qualitatively different attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows.
    Marotta A; Román-Caballero R; Lupiáñez J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2254-2259. PubMed ID: 29546665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceiving social gaze produces the reversed congruency effect.
    Ishikawa K; Oyama T; Tanaka Y; Okubo M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; ():17470218241232981. PubMed ID: 38320865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural basis of social attention: common and distinct mechanisms for social and nonsocial orienting stimuli.
    Narganes-Pineda C; Paz-Alonso PM; Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Chica AB
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Nov; 33(22):11010-11024. PubMed ID: 37782936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face inversion does not affect the reversed congruency effect of gaze.
    Tanaka Y; Ishikawa K; Oyama T; Okubo M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):974-982. PubMed ID: 36307577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the spatial interference effects elicited by social and non-social targets: A conditional accuracy function approach.
    Ponce R; Lupiáñez J; González-García C; Casagrande M; Marotta A
    Br J Psychol; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39267579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Target-background segregation in a spatial interference paradigm reveals shared and specific attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows.
    Román-Caballero R; Marotta A; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1561-1573. PubMed ID: 34843360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do gaze and non-gaze stimuli trigger different spatial interference effects? It depends on stimulus perceivability.
    Chen Z; Thomas RH; Chen MS
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():801151. PubMed ID: 36176796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Context Modulates Congruency Effects in Selective Attention to Social Cues.
    Ravagli A; Marini F; Marino BFM; Ricciardelli P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():940. PubMed ID: 29946281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction.
    Langton SR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):825-45. PubMed ID: 10994231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gaze elicits social and nonsocial attentional orienting: An interplay of shared and unique conflict processing mechanisms.
    Hemmerich K; Narganes-Pineda C; Marotta A; Martín-Arévalo E; Jiménez L; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Aug; 48(8):824-841. PubMed ID: 35666922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic attentional orienting to other people's gaze in schizophrenia.
    Langdon R; Seymour K; Williams T; Ward PB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1549-1558. PubMed ID: 27207190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are eyes special? Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence for a dissociation between eye-gaze and arrows attentional mechanisms.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Román-Caballero R; Narganes-Pineda C; Martín-Arévalo E
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():146-152. PubMed ID: 30935837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reverse congruency effect elicited by eye-gaze as a function of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms.
    Chacón-Candia JA; Ponce R; Marotta A
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1377379. PubMed ID: 38947900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye gaze triggers reflexive attention shifts: evidence from lateralised ERPs.
    Feng Q; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 1589():37-44. PubMed ID: 25241361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial interference between gaze direction and gaze location: a study on the eye contact effect.
    Cañadas E; Lupiáñez J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1586-98. PubMed ID: 22530703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.