These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38577277)

  • 1. The cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening in pregnant women: a systematic literature review.
    Zhang M; Zhang H; Hui X; Qu H; Xia J; Xu F; Shi C; He J; Cao Y; Hu M
    Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1268653. PubMed ID: 38577277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for Syphilis Infection in Pregnant Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Eder ML; Bean SI
    JAMA; 2018 Sep; 320(9):918-925. PubMed ID: 30193282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of HIV and syphilis antenatal screening: a modelling study.
    Bristow CC; Larson E; Anderson LJ; Klausner JD
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Aug; 92(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 26920867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeat Screening for Syphilis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Hersh AR; Megli CJ; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 132(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 30095767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for syphilis infection in pregnant women: evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.
    Wolff T; Shelton E; Sessions C; Miller T
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 May; 150(10):710-6. PubMed ID: 19451578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing and treatment for sexually transmitted and genital infections in pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
    Saweri OPM; Batura N; Al Adawiyah R; Causer LM; Pomat WS; Vallely AJ; Wiseman V
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253135. PubMed ID: 34138932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of interventions to improve screening for syphilis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hawkes S; Matin N; Broutet N; Low N
    Lancet Infect Dis; 2011 Sep; 11(9):684-91. PubMed ID: 21683653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost and cost-effectiveness of scaling up screening and treatment of syphilis in pregnancy: a model.
    Kahn JG; Jiwani A; Gomez GB; Hawkes SJ; Chesson HW; Broutet N; Kamb ML; Newman LM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87510. PubMed ID: 24489931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antenatal syphilis screening in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned from Tanzania.
    Watson-Jones D; Oliff M; Terris-Prestholt F; Changalucha J; Gumodoka B; Mayaud P; Semakafu AM; Kumaranayake L; Gavyole A; Mabey D; Hayes R
    Trop Med Int Health; 2005 Sep; 10(9):934-43. PubMed ID: 16135202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy as an alternative screening strategy in the UK: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Huntington S; Weston G; Seedat F; Marshall J; Bailey H; Tebruegge M; Ahmed I; Turner K; Adams E
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038505. PubMed ID: 33444184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of antenatal syphilis point of care testing on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review.
    Brandenburger D; Ambrosino E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247649. PubMed ID: 33765040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, and hepatitis B and C virus infections in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu S; Wang J; Guo Q; Lan H; Sun Y; Ren M; Liu Y; Wang P; Wang L; Su R; Zhang J; Chen Y; Li G
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2023 Aug; 29(8):1000-1007. PubMed ID: 36921717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of introducing rapid syphilis tests into an antenatal syphilis screening programme in Mwanza, Tanzania.
    Vickerman P; Peeling RW; Terris-Prestholt F; Changalucha J; Mabey D; Watson-Jones D; Watts C
    Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Dec; 82 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):v38-43. PubMed ID: 17215276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction of rapid syphilis testing in antenatal care: A systematic review of the impact on HIV and syphilis testing uptake and coverage.
    Swartzendruber A; Steiner RJ; Adler MR; Kamb ML; Newman LM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 130 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S15-21. PubMed ID: 26001704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of rapid syphilis screening in prenatal HIV testing programs in Haiti.
    Schackman BR; Neukermans CP; Fontain SN; Nolte C; Joseph P; Pape JW; Fitzgerald DW
    PLoS Med; 2007 May; 4(5):e183. PubMed ID: 17535105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of dual maternal HIV and syphilis testing strategies in high and low HIV prevalence countries: a modelling study.
    Rodriguez PJ; Roberts DA; Meisner J; Sharma M; Owiredu MN; Gomez B; Mello MB; Bobrik A; Vodianyk A; Storey A; Githuka G; Chidarikire T; Barnabas R; Barr-Dichiara M; Jamil MS; Baggaley R; Johnson C; Taylor MM; Drake AL
    Lancet Glob Health; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e61-e71. PubMed ID: 33227254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cost-effectiveness of 10 antenatal syphilis screening and treatment approaches in Peru, Tanzania, and Zambia.
    Terris-Prestholt F; Vickerman P; Torres-Rueda S; Santesso N; Sweeney S; Mallma P; Shelley KD; Garcia PJ; Bronzan R; Gill MM; Broutet N; Wi T; Watts C; Mabey D; Peeling RW; Newman L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 130 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S73-80. PubMed ID: 25963907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategic options for antenatal screening for syphilis in the United Kingdom: a cost effectiveness analysis.
    Connor N; Roberts J; Nicoll A
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10807140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.