These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3857760)
1. [Comparative characteristics of the adhesiveness of filling materials based on scanning electron microscopic data]. Doĭnikov AI; Lobach AO; Gumetskiĭ RA; Kovalishin VI; Kostur IaI Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1985; 64(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 3857760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Marginal and surface behavior of composite materials in vivo]. Gängler P; Hoyer I; Wucherpfennig G; Sandner B Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1987; 75(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 2962398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Characteristics of the adhesion to dental tissues of evicrol filling material based on scanning electron microscopic data]. Doĭnikov AI; Kortukov EV; Shmal'ko NM Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1981; 60(4):13-5. PubMed ID: 6944908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical dental adhesive application: the influence on composite-enamel interface morphology. Matei R; Popescu MR; Suciu M; Rauten AM Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(3):863-8. PubMed ID: 25329113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of functional monomers in bonding to enamel: acid-base resistant zone and bonding performance. Li N; Nikaido T; Takagaki T; Sadr A; Makishi P; Chen J; Tagami J J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):722-30. PubMed ID: 20546822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Protective effect on enamel of ultra-micronized hydroxyapatite in combination with orthodontic composite cement. In vivo study]. Giordano M; Macchi A; Ostinelli E; Tagliabue A Minerva Stomatol; 1996; 45(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 8741091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro study comparing finishing technics of composite resins and their effects on the surrounding enamel. Pellett C J Nebr Dent Assoc; 1979; 56(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 297130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scanning analysis of neoteric composite systems as to enamel-composite bond and surface integrity. Birtcil RF; Leung RL; Martin DW; Judes H; Stark MM J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1977 Aug; 5(8):58-64. PubMed ID: 381314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy). Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical studies aimed at evaluating the composite restorative material Evicrol, in place from 2 to 3 years]. Buth K; Janik G; Janik G; Klinke G Stomatol DDR; 1982 Feb; 32(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 6956030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo. Garcia-Godoy F; Krämer N; Feilzer AJ; Frankenberger R Dent Mater; 2010 Nov; 26(11):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20800270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adhesive strength between teeth and resin cements for porcelain laminate veneer. Nakamura T; Miyamae M; Koh N; Hino T; Maruyama T J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1992 Dec; 32():21-6. PubMed ID: 1341707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of five adhesive systems to primary enamel. Hosoya Y; Tominaga A Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 10029967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Observations made by the replica technique on adhesion of visible light-cured composite resins to cavities. Amano Y; Kouchi T; Katayama H; Kakinuma T; Takei T; Katayama T; Katayama I Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1986; 15(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 3524715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]