These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38577796)

  • 1. Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.
    Henckens SPG; Schuring N; Elliott JA; Johar A; Markar SR; Gantxegi A; Lagergren P; Hanna GB; Pera M; Reynolds JV; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS;
    Ann Surg; 2024 Aug; 280(2):267-273. PubMed ID: 38577796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lasting symptoms and long-term health-related quality of life after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Eyck BM; Klevebro F; van der Wilk BJ; Johar A; Wijnhoven BPL; van Lanschot JJB; Lagergren P; Markar SR; Lagarde SM;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):582-588. PubMed ID: 34763951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nuytens F; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Gagnière J; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Markar SR; Piessen G;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Apr; 156(4):323-332. PubMed ID: 33595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei ZD; Zhang HL; Yang YS; Chen LQ
    J Invest Surg; 2021 Sep; 34(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 32036710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
    Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe Transition from Open to Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer Utilizing Process Management Methodology.
    Bjelovic M; Gunjic D; Babic T; Veselinovic M; Djukanovic M; Potkonjak D; Milosavljevic V
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jul; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 39124631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial.
    Mariette C; Markar S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Pezet D; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrere N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Bonnetain F; Piessen G;
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jun; 271(6):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 31404005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Neck-Abdominal First Approach on the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Hoshino A; Nakajima Y; Kawada K; Tokairin Y; Okada T; Matsui T; Yamaguchi K; Kawano T; Kinugasa Y
    World J Surg; 2020 Nov; 44(11):3829-3836. PubMed ID: 32591842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcome of totally minimally invasive versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
    Yu WQ; Zhai LX; Shi GD; Tang JY; Gao HJ; Wei YC
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3727-3733. PubMed ID: 37085421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
    Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hybrid laparoscopic thoracotomic esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis].
    Hoeppner J; Marjanovic G; Glatz T; Kulemann B; Hopt UT
    Chirurg; 2014 Jul; 85(7):628-35. PubMed ID: 25000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
    Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs. Open Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Comparison.
    Vincke A; Miftode S; Alfarawan F; Bockhorn M; El-Sourani N
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
    Terayama M; Okamura A; Kuriyama K; Takahashi N; Tamura M; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Sep; 31(9):5748-5756. PubMed ID: 38896227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.