151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38578352)
21. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].
Gao GM; Liu DN; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Biondo S; Trenti L; Espin E; Bianco F; Barrios O; Falato A; De Franciscis S; Solis A; Kreisler E;
JAMA Surg; 2020 Aug; 155(8):e201625. PubMed ID: 32492131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial).
Park J; Angenete E; Bock D; Correa-Marinez A; Danielsen AK; Gehrman J; Haglind E; Jansen JE; Skullman S; Wedin A; Rosenberg J
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 30911920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Initial Experience with Transition from Open to Robotic-assisted Proctectomy for Patients with Rectal Cancer.
Gilshtein H; Neymark M; Harbi A; Lutsyk M; Duek D
Isr Med Assoc J; 2021 Nov; 23(11):731-734. PubMed ID: 34811990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer.
Keane C; Park J; Öberg S; Wedin A; Bock D; O'Grady G; Bissett I; Rosenberg J; Angenete E
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):645-652. PubMed ID: 30706439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Prassas D; Vossos V; Rehders A; Knoefel WT; Krieg A
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2020 Dec; 405(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 32705343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Advantages of Early Preventive Ileostomy Closure after Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Institutional Retrospective Study of 123 Consecutive Patients.
Zhou MW; Wang ZH; Chen ZY; Xiang JB; Gu XD
Dig Surg; 2017; 34(4):305-311. PubMed ID: 27941329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transumbilical defunctioning ileostomy: A new approach for patients at risks of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection.
Eto K; Omura N; Haruki K; Uno Y; Ohkuma M; Nakajima S; Anan T; Kosuge M; Fujita T; Ishida K; Yanaga K
Anticancer Res; 2013 Nov; 33(11):5011-5. PubMed ID: 24222144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Wakasugi M; Miyagaki H; Kawabata R; Tsujie M; Hasegawa J
J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 33886065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. LASSO-based nomogram predicts the risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome for middle and low rectal cancer underwent robotic surgery.
Houqiong J; Yuli Y; Yahang L; Tao L; Yang L; Yaxiong L; Dongning L; Taiyuan L
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3378-3387. PubMed ID: 38714570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Risk factors of permanent stoma in rectal cancer patients undergoing transabdominal anterior resection with temporary stoma].
Wang XY; Tao R; Qu Z; Zhang Y; Deng YM; Yi JN; Deng MY; Liu WD
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 23(8):780-785. PubMed ID: 32810950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study.
Huang Y; Yu N
J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 38619667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?
Ackerman SJ; Daniel S; Baik R; Liu E; Mehendale S; Tackett S; Hellan M
J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29065737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcome of early versus late ileostomy closure in patients with rectal cancers undergoing low anterior resection: A prospective cohort study.
Bananzade A; Dehghankhalili M; Bahrami F; Tadayon SMK; Ghaffarpasand F
Asian J Surg; 2023 Oct; 46(10):4277-4282. PubMed ID: 36797086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic versus open rectal resection.
Sebastian A; Stupart D; Watters DA
ANZ J Surg; 2019 Mar; 89(3):E52-E55. PubMed ID: 30294847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study.
Huang CW; Su WC; Chang TK; Ma CJ; Yin TC; Tsai HL; Chen PJ; Chen YC; Li CC; Hsieh YC; Wang JY
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):308. PubMed ID: 33239020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study.
Liu C; Zhang J; Li L; Zhang L; Shang L; Ma Y
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Apr; 408(1):151. PubMed ID: 37055576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Safety and Feasibility of Temporary Ileostomy in Older Patients: A Retrospective Study.
Maeda S; Ouchi A; Komori K; Kinoshita T; Oshiro T; Numata Y; Ito S; Abe T; Shimizu Y
Wound Manag Prev; 2022 Jul; 68(7):18-24. PubMed ID: 35895293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
