These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3857863)

  • 1. Silhouette profiles in the assessment of facial esthetics: a comparison of cases treated with various orthodontic appliances.
    Barrer JG; Ghafari J
    Am J Orthod; 1985 May; 87(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 3857863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics.
    Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, and Fränkel appliances.
    Gianelly AA; Arena SA; Bernstein L
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 86(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 6592975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 2. Profile silhouette evaluation.
    Mergen JL; Southard KA; Dawson DV; Fogle LL; Casko JS; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 15067262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial aesthetics following edgewise and Fränkel appliance therapy: the application of Chernoff faces.
    Battagel JM; Battagel NJ
    Br J Orthod; 1994 May; 21(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 8043562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Esthetic perceptions of facial silhouettes after treatment with a mandibular protraction appliance.
    Molina de Paula EC; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Siqueira DF; Valarelli DP; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):311-316. PubMed ID: 28153160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esthetic perception of facial profile after treatment with the Thurow Appliance.
    Pithon MM; Lacerda-Santos R; Oliveira DL; Alves JV; Britto JP; Souza Eda S; Alves LP; Barbosa G; Coqueiro Rda S; Santos AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthodontic treatment of a patient with Lowe syndrome.
    Ruellas AC; Pithon MM; dos Santos RL; de Oliveira DD; de Oliveira AM; de Oliveira MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):562-8. PubMed ID: 21967945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 27063315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Profile changes in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparison of the effects of Edgewise and Fränkel appliance therapy.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 2792214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Rego MV; Martinez EF; Coelho RM; Leal LM; Thiesen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):559-564. PubMed ID: 28257740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The adult profile and the Edgewise technic].
    Giordanetto J
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):331-5. PubMed ID: 9432621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posttreatment changes in different facial types.
    Zaher AR; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):425-36. PubMed ID: 7864464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment.
    Young TM; Smith RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 May; 103(5):452-8. PubMed ID: 8480714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 8746176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II correction in a growing patient with hyperdivergent growth patterns and severe overjet.
    Park JH
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e35-44. PubMed ID: 21490986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early treatment of class III malocclusion.
    Kumar A; Rohilla A; Tandon P; Nager A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 25109058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.