BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38581574)

  • 1. Comparison of classical, coblation, and combined adenoidectomy techniques in paediatric patients: a single-blind, prospective study.
    Alaskarov E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3735-3741. PubMed ID: 38581574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two different adenoidectomy techniques with special emphasize on postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates: coblation technique vs. cold curettage.
    Özkiriş M; Karaçavuş S; Kapusuz Z; Saydam L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 77(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 23266160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy.
    Bidaye R; Vaid N; Desarda K
    J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):294-299. PubMed ID: 30885281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paediatric adenoidectomy: endoscopic coblation technique compared to cold curettage.
    Di Rienzo Businco L; Angelone AM; Mattei A; Ventura L; Lauriello M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2012 Apr; 32(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 22767975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Endoscope-Assisted Coblation Adenoidectomy to Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy in Terms of Postoperative Eustachian Tube Function.
    Gülşen S; Çikrikçi S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 31(4):919-923. PubMed ID: 31764564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pediatric Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Study Between Cold Curettage and Coblation Technique.
    Hapalia VB; Panchal AJ; Kumar R; Kapadia PB; Bhiryani MA; Verma RB; Parmar ND
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 74(Suppl 2):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 36452765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coblation versus microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy.
    Mularczyk C; Walner DL; Hamming KK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():29-31. PubMed ID: 29287875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy - a randomised controlled trial.
    Juneja R; Meher R; Raj A; Rathore P; Wadhwa V; Arora N
    J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):289-293. PubMed ID: 31046870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trans-oral endoscopic assisted radio-frequency for adenoid ablation; A randomized prospective comparative clinical study.
    Elzayat S; Elsherif H; Aouf M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Aug; 48(4):710-717. PubMed ID: 33261981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacteremia during adenoidectomy: a comparison of suction diathermy adenoid ablation and adenoid curettage.
    Casserly P; Kieran S; Phelan E; Smyth E; Lacy P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2010 Aug; 119(8):526-9. PubMed ID: 20860277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy to curettage adenoidectomy.
    Öztürk Ö; Polat Ş
    Adv Ther; 2012 Aug; 29(8):708-21. PubMed ID: 22864943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The incidence of revision adenoidectomy: A comparison of four surgical techniques over a 10-year period.
    Bhandari N; Don DM; Koempel JA
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2018 Jun; 97(6):E5-E9. PubMed ID: 30036416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cold versus hot adenoidectomy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Na'ara S; Sayegh W; Nassar N; Shinnawi S; Gil Z; Gordin A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110087. PubMed ID: 32408011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.
    Pagella F; Matti E; Colombo A; Giourgos G; Mira E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 18720070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrocautery versus curette adenoidectomy: comparison of postoperative results.
    Clemens J; McMurray JS; Willging JP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1998 Mar; 43(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 9578120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three different adenoidectomy techniques in children - has the conventional technique been surpassed?
    Ferreira MS; Mangussi-Gomes J; Ximendes R; Evangelista AR; Miranda EL; Garcia LB; Stamm AC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():145-149. PubMed ID: 29287856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of transnasal endoscopic powered adenoidectomy in patients with choanal adenoids.
    Al-Mazrou KA; Al-Qahtani A; Al-Fayez AI
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1650-2. PubMed ID: 19758710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.
    Abdel-Aziz M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):1037-40. PubMed ID: 21833560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Comparison between Microdebrider Assisted Adenoidectomy and Coblation Adenoidectomy: Analyzing the Intraoperative Parameters and Post-operative Recovery.
    Singh J; Bhardwaj B
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Mar; 72(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32158657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regrowth of the adenoids after coblation adenoidectomy: cephalometric analysis.
    Kim SY; Lee WH; Rhee CS; Lee CH; Kim JW
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Oct; 123(10):2567-72. PubMed ID: 23918261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.