117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38583940)
1. The Impact of Adjusting for Hysterectomy Prevalence on Cervical Cancer Incidence Rates and Trends Among Women Aged 30 Years and Older - United States, 2001-2019.
Gopalani SV; Sawaya GF; Rositch AF; Dasari S; Thompson TD; Mix JM; Saraiya M
Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38583940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased age and race-specific incidence of cervical cancer after correction for hysterectomy prevalence in the United States from 2000 to 2009.
Rositch AF; Nowak RG; Gravitt PE
Cancer; 2014 Jul; 120(13):2032-8. PubMed ID: 24821088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States.
Beavis AL; Gravitt PE; Rositch AF
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 28112816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent trends in racial and regional disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in United States.
Yoo W; Kim S; Huh WK; Dilley S; Coughlin SS; Partridge EE; Chung Y; Dicks V; Lee JK; Bae S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172548. PubMed ID: 28234949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in hysterectomy prevalence and trends among U.S. States and Territories-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012-2020.
Gopalani SV; Dasari SR; Adam EE; Thompson TD; White MC; Saraiya M
Cancer Causes Control; 2023 Oct; 34(10):829-835. PubMed ID: 37329443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in endometrial cancer incidence by race and histology with a correction for the prevalence of hysterectomy, SEER 1992 to 2008.
Jamison PM; Noone AM; Ries LA; Lee NC; Edwards BK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Feb; 22(2):233-41. PubMed ID: 23239812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing endometrial cancer risk among US women: long-term trends using hysterectomy-adjusted analysis.
Doll KM; Winn AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):318.e1-318.e9. PubMed ID: 31125544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of cervical and uterine cancers in Massachusetts, 1995 to 2010.
Stang A; Hawk H; Knowlton R; Gershman ST; Kuss O
Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 25241148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark.
Lam JU; Lynge E; Njor SH; Rebolj M
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(8):1136-43. PubMed ID: 25800858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysterectomy prevalence and adjusted cervical and uterine cancer rates in England and Wales.
Redburn JC; Murphy MF
BJOG; 2001 Apr; 108(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 11305546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher prevalence of hysterectomy among rural women than urban women: Implications for measures of disparities in uterine and cervical cancers.
Adam EE; White MC; Saraiya M
J Rural Health; 2022 Mar; 38(2):416-419. PubMed ID: 34081371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in cervical cancer incidence rates by age, race/ethnicity, histological subtype, and stage at diagnosis in the United States.
Islami F; Fedewa SA; Jemal A
Prev Med; 2019 Jun; 123():316-323. PubMed ID: 31002830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers.
Clarke MA; Devesa SS; Harvey SV; Wentzensen N
J Clin Oncol; 2019 Aug; 37(22):1895-1908. PubMed ID: 31116674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Historical and projected hysterectomy rates in the USA: Implications for future observed cervical cancer rates and evaluating prevention interventions.
Simms KT; Yuill S; Killen J; Smith MA; Kulasingam S; de Kok IMCM; van Ballegooijen M; Burger EA; Regan C; Kim JJ; Canfell K
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):710-718. PubMed ID: 32723676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Mortality by Stage and Histologic Subtype.
Clarke MA; Devesa SS; Hammer A; Wentzensen N
JAMA Oncol; 2022 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 35511145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. US hysterectomy prevalence by age, race and ethnicity from BRFSS and NHIS: implications for analyses of cervical and uterine cancer rates.
Adam EE; White MC; Saraiya M
Cancer Causes Control; 2022 Jan; 33(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 34546462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy on race-specific rates of corpus, cervical, and ovarian cancers in the United States.
Merrill RM
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 16(12):880-7. PubMed ID: 17027290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy prevalence on rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999-2004.
Wong CA; Jim MA; King J; Tom-Orme L; Henderson JA; Saraiya M; Richardson LC; Layne L; Suryaprasad A; Espey DK
Cancer Causes Control; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1681-9. PubMed ID: 21984306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The temporal and age-dependent patterns of hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer incidence rates in Denmark: a population-based cohort study.
Hammer A; Kahlert J; Rositch A; Pedersen L; Gravitt P; Blaakaer J; Soegaard M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 27861705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysterectomy-corrected rates of endometrial cancer among women younger than age 50 in the United States.
Temkin SM; Kohn EC; Penberthy L; Cronin KA; Rubinsak L; Dickie LA; Minasian L; Noone AM
Cancer Causes Control; 2018 May; 29(4-5):427-433. PubMed ID: 29497884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]