BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38583996)

  • 1. Influence of attaching mechanical retentive devices onto frameworks on fracture resistance of implant-supported zirconia crowns.
    Kobayashi T; Honda J; Kubochi K; Iwasaki T; Watanabe Y; Komine F
    Dent Mater J; 2024 Jun; 43(3):359-366. PubMed ID: 38583996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of zirconia-composite veneered crowns in comparison with zirconia-porcelain crowns.
    Alsadon O; Patrick D; Johnson A; Pollington S; Wood D
    Dent Mater J; 2017 May; 36(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 28190816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
    Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of framework design on fracture load after thermal cycling and mechanical loading of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses.
    Komine F; Kamio S; Takata H; Yagawa S; Taguchi S; Taguchi K; Hashiguchi A; Matsumura H
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jan; 37(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28883302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlations between fracture load of zirconia implant supported single crowns and mechanical properties of restorative material and cement.
    Rohr N; Märtin S; Fischer J
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):222-228. PubMed ID: 29176305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations.
    Taguchi K; Komine F; Fushiki R; Blatz MB; Kamio S; Matsumura H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):983-91. PubMed ID: 23730807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture load of implant-supported zirconia all-ceramic crowns luted with various cements.
    Lim HP; Yoo JM; Park SW; Yang HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 20617227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of framework design and layering material on fracture strength of implant-supported zirconia-based molar crowns.
    Kamio S; Komine F; Taguchi K; Iwasaki T; Blatz MB; Matsumura H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1407-13. PubMed ID: 25115334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns.
    de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ; de Jager N; Kuijs R; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25819357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of coping/veneer thickness on the fracture toughness and residual stress of implant supported, cement retained zirconia and metal-ceramic crowns.
    Millen CS; Reuben RL; Ibbetson RJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e250-8. PubMed ID: 22818887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The failure load of CAD/CAM generated zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers with different preparation designs.
    Alghazzawi TF; Lemons J; Liu PR; Essig ME; Janowski GM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):386-93. PubMed ID: 23217471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
    Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
    Magne P; Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21985284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses.
    Kondo T; Komine F; Honda J; Takata H; Moriya Y
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 30446411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core / veneering ceramic complex.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Pereira SM; Amaral R; Bottino MA; Pekkan G
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Jun; 15(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 23700578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single-tooth implant restorations: influence of material selection for type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments.
    Magne P; Paranhos MP; Burnett LH; Magne M; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 21044162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro evaluation of fracture load of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses fabricated with different veneer materials.
    Takata H; Komine F; Honda J; Blatz MB; Matsumura H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 29484710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.