157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38584323)
1. A comparison of virtual reality anatomy models to prosections in station-based anatomy teaching.
Ail G; Freer F; Chan CS; Jones M; Broad J; Canale GP; Elston P; Leeney J; Vickerton P
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):763-769. PubMed ID: 38584323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomy Learning from Prosected Cadaveric Specimens Versus Plastic Models: A Comparative Study of Upper Limb Anatomy.
Mitrousias V; Karachalios TS; Varitimidis SE; Natsis K; Arvanitis DL; Zibis AH
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul; 13(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 31251473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy.
Moro C; Štromberga Z; Raikos A; Stirling A
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):549-559. PubMed ID: 28419750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Zhao J; Xu X; Jiang H; Ding Y
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 32334594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementing virtual reality technology to teach medical college systemic anatomy: A pilot study.
Liao ML; Yeh CC; Lue JH; Chang MF
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 38487974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education.
Mogali SR; Yeong WY; Tan HKJ; Tan GJS; Abrahams PH; Zary N; Low-Beer N; Ferenczi MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 28544582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences Between Attached and Detached Cadaveric Prosections on Students' Identification Ability During Practical Examinations.
Mattingly S; Hardesty E; Chovanec K; Cobos ME; Garcia J; Grizzle M; Huerta A; Ohtake J; Romero-Alvarez D; Gonzalez VH
Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Nov; 14(6):808-815. PubMed ID: 33037784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The additional role of virtual to traditional dissection in teaching anatomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Boscolo-Berto R; Tortorella C; Porzionato A; Stecco C; Picardi EEE; Macchi V; De Caro R
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Apr; 43(4):469-479. PubMed ID: 32940718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Musculoskeletal anatomy: evaluation and comparison of common teaching and learning modalities.
Zibis A; Mitrousias V; Varitimidis S; Raoulis V; Fyllos A; Arvanitis D
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1517. PubMed ID: 33452299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immersive virtual reality in orthopedic surgery as elective subject for medical students : First experiences in curricular teaching.
Schöbel T; Schuschke L; Youssef Y; Rotzoll D; Theopold J; Osterhoff G
Orthopadie (Heidelb); 2024 May; 53(5):369-378. PubMed ID: 38575780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach.
Davis CR; Bates AS; Ellis H; Roberts AM
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 24249485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy.
Stepan K; Zeiger J; Hanchuk S; Del Signore A; Shrivastava R; Govindaraj S; Iloreta A
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2017 Oct; 7(10):1006-1013. PubMed ID: 28719062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound simulator-assisted teaching of cardiac anatomy to preclinical anatomy students: A pilot randomized trial of a three-hour learning exposure.
Canty DJ; Hayes JA; Story DA; Royse CF
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 24706544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model.
Chen S; Zhu J; Cheng C; Pan Z; Liu L; Du J; Shen X; Shen Z; Zhu H; Liu J; Yang H; Ma C; Pan H
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):395. PubMed ID: 33129310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: Exploring immersive three-dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education.
Maresky HS; Oikonomou A; Ali I; Ditkofsky N; Pakkal M; Ballyk B
Clin Anat; 2019 Mar; 32(2):238-243. PubMed ID: 30295333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of plastinated prosections for teaching anatomy--the view of medical students on the value of this learning resource.
Fruhstorfer BH; Palmer J; Brydges S; Abrahams PH
Clin Anat; 2011 Mar; 24(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 21322047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound and cadaveric prosections as methods for teaching cardiac anatomy: a comparative study.
Griksaitis MJ; Sawdon MA; Finn GM
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 22069248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the effectiveness of dissection and prosection on short-term anatomic knowledge retention in a reciprocal peer-teaching program.
Lackey-Cornelison WL; Bauler LD; Smith J
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Jun; 44(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 32412383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a superior simulator for human anatomy education? How virtual dissection can overcome the anatomic and pedagogic limitations of cadaveric dissection.
Darras KE; de Bruin ABH; Nicolaou S; Dahlström N; Persson A; van Merriënboer J; Forster BB
Med Teach; 2018 Jul; 40(7):752-753. PubMed ID: 29569960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students.
Attardi SM; Barbeau ML; Rogers KA
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Nov; 11(6):592-604. PubMed ID: 29493909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
