These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38585422)

  • 1. An extension of the best-worst method based on the spherical fuzzy sets for multi-criteria decision-making.
    Haseli G; Sheikh R; Ghoushchi SJ; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M; Moslem S; Deveci M; Kadry S
    Granul Comput; 2024; 9(2):40. PubMed ID: 38585422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of improved fuzzy best worst analytic hierarchy process on renewable energy.
    Majumder P; Balas VE; Paul A; Baidya D
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e453. PubMed ID: 33954237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COVID-19 safe campus evaluation for universities by a hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making model.
    Baskak D; Ozbey S; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):8133-8153. PubMed ID: 36056282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting municipal solid waste management alternative with 2-dimensional uncertain linguistic sets.
    Che Y; Zhang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):68582-68599. PubMed ID: 35543779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An efficiency-based interval type-2 fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for makeshift hospital selection.
    Chen ZH; Wan SP; Dong JY
    Appl Soft Comput; 2022 Jan; 115():108243. PubMed ID: 34899106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decision-making framework for COVID-19 infodemic management strategies evaluation in spherical fuzzy environment.
    Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi S; Bonab SR; Ghiaci AM
    Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess; 2023; 37(4):1635-1648. PubMed ID: 36714449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple criteria decision analytic methods in management with T-spherical fuzzy information.
    Chen TY
    Artif Intell Rev; 2023 Apr; ():1-71. PubMed ID: 37362889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
    Celik E; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):64793-64817. PubMed ID: 34313933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Einstein exponential operation laws of spherical fuzzy sets and aggregation operators in decision making.
    Ajay D; Selvachandran G; Aldring J; Thong PH; Son LH; Cuong BC
    Multimed Tools Appl; 2023 Apr; ():1-24. PubMed ID: 37362734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fermatean Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Operators and BWM-Entropy-Based Combined Compromise Solution Approach: An Application to Green Supplier Selection.
    Wei D; Meng D; Rong Y; Liu Y; Garg H; Pamucar D
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 35741498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection.
    Gong JW; Liu HC; You XY; Yin L
    Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Apr; 102():107118. PubMed ID: 36570416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China.
    Zhao H; Wang Y; Guo S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0283655. PubMed ID: 37036889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method.
    Torkayesh AE; Malmir B; Rajabi Asadabadi M
    Waste Manag; 2021 Mar; 122():100-112. PubMed ID: 33508530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
    Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the customer satisfaction of public transportation in Tehran during the COVID-19 pandemic using MCDM techniques.
    Shabani A; Shabani A; Ahmadinejad B; Salmasnia A
    Case Stud Transp Policy; 2022 Sep; 10(3):1520-1530. PubMed ID: 35582204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regional Water Resources Security Evaluation Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS Method.
    Tu Y; Chen K; Wang H; Li Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32664379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A collaborative emergency decision making approach based on BWM and TODIM under interval 2-tuple linguistic environment.
    Qi K; Chai H; Duan Q; Du Y; Wang Q; Sun J; Liew KM
    Int J Mach Learn Cybern; 2022; 13(2):383-405. PubMed ID: 34567279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.
    Zhong S; Zhang J; He X; Liu S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271194. PubMed ID: 36137146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complex T-spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their applications in multiple-criteria decision-making.
    Karaaslan F; Dawood MAD
    Complex Intell Systems; 2021; 7(5):2711-2734. PubMed ID: 34777971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel extension of Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for new product development.
    Göçer F; Büyüközkan G
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16726. PubMed ID: 37292298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.