These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38585462)

  • 1. Diagnosis Unreliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation.
    Dadkhah M; Oermann MH; Hegedüs M; Raman R; Dávid LD
    Adv Pharm Bull; 2024 Mar; 14(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 38585462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unveiling the Hidden Menace: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Hijacked Medical Journals.
    Dadkhah M; Hegedűs M; Nedungadi P; Raman R; Dávid LD
    Adv Pharm Bull; 2024 Jul; 14(2):255-261. PubMed ID: 39206400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can ChatGPT identify predatory biomedical and dental journals? A cross-sectional content analysis.
    Al-Moghrabi D; Abu Arqub S; Maroulakos MP; Pandis N; Fleming PS
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104840. PubMed ID: 38219888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing.
    Tang A; Li KK; Kwok KO; Cao L; Luong S; Tam W
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2024 Mar; 56(2):314-318. PubMed ID: 37904646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting Hijacked Journals by Using Classification Algorithms.
    Andoohgin Shahri M; Jazi MD; Borchardt G; Dadkhah M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):655-668. PubMed ID: 28397175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Scelles N
    J Sci Med Sport; 2024 Apr; 27(4):266-269. PubMed ID: 38158321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masquerade of authority: hijacked journals are gaining more credibility than original ones.
    Hegedűs M; Dadkhah M; Dávid LD
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2024 Aug; 11(3):235-239. PubMed ID: 38953515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.
    Guleria A; Krishan K; Sharma V; Kanchan T
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2023 Sep; 17(9):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 37824352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overview of Chatbots with special emphasis on artificial intelligence-enabled ChatGPT in medical science.
    Chakraborty C; Pal S; Bhattacharya M; Dash S; Lee SS
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1237704. PubMed ID: 38028668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge, Perceptions and Attitude of Researchers Towards Using ChatGPT in Research.
    Abdelhafiz AS; Ali A; Maaly AM; Ziady HH; Sultan EA; Mahgoub MA
    J Med Syst; 2024 Feb; 48(1):26. PubMed ID: 38411833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation.
    Khlaif ZN; Mousa A; Hattab MK; Itmazi J; Hassan AA; Sanmugam M; Ayyoub A
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e47049. PubMed ID: 37707884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article?
    Lee JY
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2023; 20():6. PubMed ID: 36842449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How much can we rely on artificial intelligence chatbots such as the ChatGPT software program to assist with scientific writing?
    Dashti M; Londono J; Ghasemi S; Moghaddasi N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37438164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Toolkit for Detecting Fallacious Calls for Papers from Potential Predatory Journals.
    Dadkhah M; Raja AM; Memon AR; Borchardt G; Nedungadi P; Abu-Eteen K; Raman R
    Adv Pharm Bull; 2023 Nov; 13(4):627-634. PubMed ID: 38022802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing.
    Semrl N; Feigl S; Taumberger N; Bracic T; Fluhr H; Blockeel C; Kollmann M
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 37833847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilizing ChatGPT in clinical research related to anesthesiology: a comprehensive review of opportunities and limitations.
    Lee SW; Choi WJ
    Anesth Pain Med (Seoul); 2023 Jul; 18(3):244-251. PubMed ID: 37691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of Medical Information Provided by ChatGPT: Assessment Against Clinical Guidelines and Patient Information Quality Instrument.
    Walker HL; Ghani S; Kuemmerli C; Nebiker CA; Müller BP; Raptis DA; Staubli SM
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jun; 25():e47479. PubMed ID: 37389908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.
    Athaluri SA; Manthena SV; Kesapragada VSRKM; Yarlagadda V; Dave T; Duddumpudi RTS
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37432. PubMed ID: 37182055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.
    Dergaa I; Chamari K; Zmijewski P; Ben Saad H
    Biol Sport; 2023 Apr; 40(2):615-622. PubMed ID: 37077800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can ChatGPT Accurately Answer a PICOT Question? Assessing AI Response to a Clinical Question.
    Branum C; Schiavenato M
    Nurse Educ; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 48(5):231-233. PubMed ID: 37130197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.