These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38585964)

  • 1. Foraging Under Uncertainty Follows the Marginal Value Theorem with Bayesian Updating of Environment Representations.
    Webb J; Steffan P; Hayden BY; Lee D; Kemere C; McGinley M
    bioRxiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38585964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex Continuously Signals Decision Variables in a Patch Foraging Task.
    Kane GA; James MH; Shenhav A; Daw ND; Cohen JD; Aston-Jones G
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jul; 42(29):5730-5744. PubMed ID: 35688627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty drives deviations in normative foraging decision strategies.
    Kilpatrick ZP; Davidson JD; El Hady A
    J R Soc Interface; 2021 Jul; 18(180):20210337. PubMed ID: 34255987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Foraging optimally in social neuroscience: computations and methodological considerations.
    Gabay AS; Apps MAJ
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 16(8):782-794. PubMed ID: 32232360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?
    O'Bryan LR; Lambeth SP; Schapiro SJ; Wilson ML
    Am J Primatol; 2020 Dec; 82(12):e23208. PubMed ID: 33118192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social resource foraging is guided by the principles of the Marginal Value Theorem.
    Turrin C; Fagan NA; Dal Monte O; Chang SWC
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11274. PubMed ID: 28900299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex differences in patch-leaving foraging decisions in rats.
    Garcia M; Gupta S; Wikenheiser AM
    Oxf Open Neurosci; 2023; 2():kvad011. PubMed ID: 38596244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in patch-leaving foraging decisions in rats.
    Garcia M; Gupta S; Wikenheiser AM
    bioRxiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36824852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.
    Constantino SM; Daw ND
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):837-53. PubMed ID: 25917000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.
    Marshall HH; Carter AJ; Ashford A; Rowcliffe JM; Cowlishaw G
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jul; 82(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 23650999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal movement strategies for social foragers in unpredictable environments.
    Hancock PA; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Ecology; 2006 Aug; 87(8):2094-102. PubMed ID: 16937648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foraging as an evidence accumulation process.
    Davidson JD; El Hady A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jul; 15(7):e1007060. PubMed ID: 31339878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.
    Wolfe JM; Cain MS; Alaoui-Soce A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):609-621. PubMed ID: 29270798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez.
    Olsson O; Holmgren NM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Jun; 57(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 10900189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search.
    Wolfe JM
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):10. PubMed ID: 23641077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control over patch encounters changes foraging behavior.
    Hall-McMaster S; Dayan P; Schuck NW
    iScience; 2021 Sep; 24(9):103005. PubMed ID: 34522853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing optimal foraging theory in a penguin-krill system.
    Watanabe YY; Ito M; Takahashi A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Mar; 281(1779):20132376. PubMed ID: 24478293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of facilitation and competition on group foraging in patches.
    Laguë M; Tania N; Heath J; Edelstein-Keshet L
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Oct; 310():88-96. PubMed ID: 22743132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintaining social cohesion is a more important determinant of patch residence time than maximizing food intake rate in a group-living primate, Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata).
    Kazahari N
    Primates; 2014 Apr; 55(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24515524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wild Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) feeding rates and the Marginal Value Theorem.
    DiGiorgio AL; Upton EM; Susanto TW; Knott CD
    Am J Primatol; 2020 Oct; 82(10):e23183. PubMed ID: 32761641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.