146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38586472)
1. To Remind or Not to Remind During Recruitment? An Analysis of an Online Panel in Germany.
Klee B; Costa D; Frese T; Knoechelmann A; Meyer G; Meyer T; Purschke O; Schildmann J; Steckelberg A; Mikolajczyk R
Int J Public Health; 2024; 69():1606770. PubMed ID: 38586472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kilsdonk E; van Dulmen-den Broeder E; van der Pal HJ; Hollema N; Kremer LC; van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM; van Leeuwen FE; Jaspers MW; van den Berg MH
JMIR Cancer; 2015 Nov; 1(2):e11. PubMed ID: 28410161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
Dokkum NF; Koekenbier RH; van den Broek IV; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema JS; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; Op de Coul EL
BMC Public Health; 2012 Mar; 12():176. PubMed ID: 22404911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of a financial incentive on health researchers' response to an online survey: a randomized controlled trial.
Wilson PM; Petticrew M; Calnan M; Nazareth I
J Med Internet Res; 2010 May; 12(2):e13. PubMed ID: 20457556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.
Murphy CC; Craddock Lee SJ; Geiger AM; Cox JV; Ahn C; Nair R; Gerber DE; Halm EA; McCallister K; Skinner CS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):123. PubMed ID: 32429848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with attrition in a longitudinal online study: results from the HaBIDS panel.
Rübsamen N; Akmatov MK; Castell S; Karch A; Mikolajczyk RT
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):132. PubMed ID: 28859617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mail surveys: obsolescent model or valuable instrument in general practice research?
Bergk V; Gasse C; Schnell R; Haefeli WE
Swiss Med Wkly; 2005 Apr; 135(13-14):189-91. PubMed ID: 15909235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.
Reinisch JF; Yu DC; Li WY
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26418779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention.
Fitzgerald D; Hockey R; Jones M; Mishra G; Waller M; Dobson A
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e10672. PubMed ID: 30869647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Funkhouser E; Vellala K; Baltuck C; Cacciato R; Durand E; McEdward D; Sowell E; Theisen SE; Gilbert GH;
Eval Health Prof; 2017 Sep; 40(3):332-358. PubMed ID: 26755526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of response mode on study results: offering cigarette smokers a choice of postal or online completion of a survey.
Callas PW; Solomon LJ; Hughes JR; Livingston AE
J Med Internet Res; 2010 Oct; 12(4):e46. PubMed ID: 20965873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.
Starr K; McPherson G; Forrest M; Cotton SC
Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():295. PubMed ID: 26152519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PROM Validation Using Paper-Based or Online Surveys: Data Collection Methods Affect the Sociodemographic and Health Profile of the Sample.
Rowen D; Carlton J; Elliott J
Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):845-850. PubMed ID: 31426923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of home visits as an additional recruitment step on the composition of the final sample: a cross-sectional analysis in two study centers of the German National Cohort (NAKO).
Krist L; Bedir A; Fricke J; Kluttig A; Mikolajczyk R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):176. PubMed ID: 34425747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenges of internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results.
Koo M; Skinner H
J Med Internet Res; 2005 Mar; 7(1):e6. PubMed ID: 15829478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.
Mauz E; Hoffmann R; Houben R; Krause L; Kamtsiuris P; Gößwald A
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e64. PubMed ID: 29506967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
