149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38587361)
1. Update on FDG-PET in pediatric lymphoma.
Kurch L; Kluge R
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Mar; 68(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 38587361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The utility of FDG PET in diagnosis and follow-up of lymphoma in childhood.
Sioka C
Eur J Pediatr; 2013 Jun; 172(6):733-8. PubMed ID: 23559330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in staging, response evaluation, and treatment planning of lymphomas.
Specht L
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2007 Jul; 17(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 17591566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of whole-body [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and conventional techniques in the staging of patients with Hodgkin and aggressive non Hodgkin lymphoma.
Pelosi E; Pregno P; Penna D; Deandreis D; Chiappella A; Limerutti G; Vitolo U; Mancini M; Bisi G; Gallo E
Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 18414808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [(18)F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical utility and impact on management.
Montravers F; McNamara D; Landman-Parker J; Grahek D; Kerrou K; Younsi N; Wioland M; Leverger G; Talbot JN
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Sep; 29(9):1155-65. PubMed ID: 12192560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined modality treatment for PET-positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: favorable outcomes of combined modality treatment for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and positive interim or postchemotherapy FDG-PET.
Halasz LM; Jacene HA; Catalano PJ; Van den Abbeele AD; Lacasce A; Mauch PM; Ng AK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):e647-54. PubMed ID: 22607911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and [
Morakote W; Baratto L; Ramasamy SK; Adams LC; Liang T; Sarrami AH; Daldrup-Link HE
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):643-653. PubMed ID: 37542653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma.
Juweid ME
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 727():1-19. PubMed ID: 21331925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of findings with 18-FDG PET and CT in pretherapeutic staging of malignant lymphoma].
Thill R; Neuerburg J; Fabry U; Cremerius U; Wagenknecht G; Hellwig D; Osieka R; Günther R; Büll U
Nuklearmedizin; 1997 Oct; 36(7):234-9. PubMed ID: 9441282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification.
Cheson BD; Fisher RI; Barrington SF; Cavalli F; Schwartz LH; Zucca E; Lister TA; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Sep; 32(27):3059-68. PubMed ID: 25113753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography avoid negative iliac crest biopsies in evaluation of marrow involvement by lymphoma at time of initial staging?
Mittal BR; Manohar K; Malhotra P; Das R; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Varma N; Varma S
Leuk Lymphoma; 2011 Nov; 52(11):2111-6. PubMed ID: 21745169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staging in childhood lymphoma: differences between FDG-PET and CT.
Hermann S; Wormanns D; Pixberg M; Hunold A; Heindel W; Jürgens H; Schober O; Franzius C
Nuklearmedizin; 2005 Feb; 44(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15711722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Computerized tomography and F-18-FDG positron emission tomography in staging of malignant lymphomas: a comparison].
Bumann D; de Wit M; Beyer W; Beese M; Lübeck M; Bücheler E; Clausen M
Rofo; 1998 May; 168(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 9617362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of whole-body 18F-FDP-PET for restaging malignant lymphoma.
Mikosch P; Gallowitsch HJ; Zinke-Cerwenka W; Heinisch M; Pipam W; Eibl M; Kresnik E; Unterweger O; Linkesch W; Lind P
Acta Med Austriaca; 2003; 30(2):41-7. PubMed ID: 12752087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequent impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Blum RH; Seymour JF; Wirth A; MacManus M; Hicks RJ
Clin Lymphoma; 2003 Jun; 4(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 12837154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of FDG-PET imaging in the management of lymphoma.
Kostakoglu L; Leonard JP; Coleman M; Goldsmith SJ
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2004 Feb; 2(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16163171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of the standardized uptake value of pre-therapeutic (18)F-FDG PET in patients with malignant lymphoma.
Ahmadzadehfar H; Rodrigues M; Zakavi R; Knoll P; Mirzaei S
Med Oncol; 2011 Dec; 28(4):1570-6. PubMed ID: 20524086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET.
MacManus MP; Seymour JF; Hicks RJ
Cancer Imaging; 2007; 7(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 17766210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Tamayo P; Martín A; Díaz L; Cabrero M; García R; García-Talavera P; Caballero D
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(5):312-321. PubMed ID: 28483374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical impact of whole body FDG-PET on the staging and therapeutic decision making for malignant lymphoma.
Sasaki M; Kuwabara Y; Koga H; Nakagawa M; Chen T; Kaneko K; Hayashi K; Nakamura K; Masuda K
Ann Nucl Med; 2002 Jul; 16(5):337-45. PubMed ID: 12230093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
