136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38587545)
1. Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study.
Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Banitalebi H; Indrekvam K; Brisby H
Eur Spine J; 2024 Jun; 33(6):2234-2241. PubMed ID: 38587545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiological Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial.
Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Franssen E; Indrekvam K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 May; 48(10):688-694. PubMed ID: 36809364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1411-E1418. PubMed ID: 31365515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study.
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg T; Haug KJ; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
Eur Spine J; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2254-2261. PubMed ID: 32556585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital computed tomography evaluation of spinal canal and dural sac before and after surgical decompression of lumbar stenosis.
Rapała K; Chaberek S; Truszczyńska A; Łukawski S; Walczak P
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 20453251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.
Mannion AF; Fekete TF; Pacifico D; O'Riordan D; Nauer S; von Büren M; Schizas C
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2552-2564. PubMed ID: 28856447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic and clinical outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study.
Li J; Li H; Zhang N; Wang ZW; Zhao TF; Chen LW; Chen G; Chen QX; Li FC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):259. PubMed ID: 32312254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).
Hermansen E; Moen G; Barstad J; Birketvedt R; Indrekvam K
Eur Spine J; 2013 Aug; 22(8):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23494757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of dural sac cross-sectional area in early and late phases after lumbar decompression surgery.
Oba H; Takahashi J; Futatsugi T; Mogami Y; Shibata S; Ohji Y; Tanikawa H
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1088-94. PubMed ID: 23850257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between lumbar lordosis preoperatively and changes in PROMs for lumbar spinal stenosis patients 2 years after spinal surgery: radiological and clinical results from the NORDSTEN-spinal stenosis trial.
Wänman J; Åkerstedt J; Banitalebi H; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Storheim K; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Hermansen E
Eur Spine J; 2024 May; 33(5):1950-1956. PubMed ID: 38386059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up.
Karlsson T; Försth P; Skorpil M; Pazarlis K; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
Bone Joint J; 2022 Dec; 104-B(12):1343-1351. PubMed ID: 36453045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine.
Schonstrom NS; Bolender NF; Spengler DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1985 Nov; 10(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 4089655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study.
Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Brox JI; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
Eur Spine J; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 34797405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Khalifeh JM; Massie LW; Dibble CF; Dorward IG; Macki M; Khandpur U; Alshohatee K; Jain D; Chang V; Ray WZ
Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(8):E439-E449. PubMed ID: 33979102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
