BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38587830)

  • 1. Data Checks Before Registering Study Protocols for Health Care Database Analyses.
    Wang SV; Schneeweiss S
    JAMA; 2024 May; 331(17):1445-1446. PubMed ID: 38587830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-independent metrics to assess the data quality of medical registries using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database.
    Salati M; Brunelli A; Dahan M; Rocco G; Van Raemdonck DE; Varela G;
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21168341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements.
    Park J; Park S; Kim K; Hwang W; Yoo S; Yi GS; Lee D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238290. PubMed ID: 32946464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the quality of the data in a transplant registry: the European Liver Transplant Registry.
    van der Meulen JH; Jacob M; Copley L
    Transplantation; 2003 Jun; 75(12):2164-7. PubMed ID: 12829938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Update on the clinical trial landscape: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov registration data, 2000-2020.
    Gresham G; Meinert JL; Gresham AG; Piantadosi S; Meinert CL
    Trials; 2022 Oct; 23(1):858. PubMed ID: 36203212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not enough SPIRIT shown in the registration and reporting of orthodontic trial protocols.
    Eleftheriadi I; Ioannou T; Katechi V; Seehra J; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 35639885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informatics and data quality at collaborative multicenter Breast and Colon Cancer Family Registries.
    McGarvey PB; Ladwa S; Oberti M; Dragomir AD; Hedlund EK; Tanenbaum DM; Suzek BE; Madhavan S
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012 Jun; 19(e1):e125-8. PubMed ID: 22323393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The growing number of hemophilia registries: Quantity vs. quality.
    Keipert C; Hesse J; Haschberger B; Heiden M; Seitz R; van den Berg HM; Hilger A;
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2015 May; 97(5):492-501. PubMed ID: 25669198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Research Misconduct Using FDA-Issued Warning Letters and Clinical Investigator Inspection List From 2010 to 2014.
    Romano CA; Nair S; Delphin ES
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Mar; 126(3):976-982. PubMed ID: 29239950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Consistency Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries.
    Sun LW; Lee DJ; Collins JA; Carll TC; Ramahi K; Sandy SJ; Unteriner JG; Weinberg DV
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 137(5):552-556. PubMed ID: 30946427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trials: trial registration cannot alone transform scientific conduct.
    Moja L
    Nat Rev Urol; 2010 Jan; 7(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 20062069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a specialist haematological malignancy database against a regional cancer registry: case ascertainment and diagnostic accuracy.
    Phekoo K; Møller H; Richards M; Schey S
    Br J Haematol; 2002 Dec; 119(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 12437646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Congenital heart surgery databases around the world: do we need a global database?
    Jacobs JP; Maruszewski B; Kurosawa H; Jacobs ML; Mavroudis C; Lacour-Gayet FG; Tchervenkov CI; Walters H; Stellin G; Ebels T; Tsang VT; Elliott MJ; Murakami A; Sano S; Mayer JE; Edwards FH; Quintessenza JA
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu; 2010; 13(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 20307856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using existing data to address important clinical questions in critical care.
    Cooke CR; Iwashyna TJ
    Crit Care Med; 2013 Mar; 41(3):886-96. PubMed ID: 23328262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Achieving a quality trauma database.
    Petrovick L
    J Trauma Nurs; 2004; 11(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 16512273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recruitment of patients into an internet-based clinical trials database: the experience of OncoLink and the National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance.
    Wei SJ; Metz JM; Coyle C; Hampshire M; Jones HA; Markowitz S; Rustgi AK
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Dec; 22(23):4730-6. PubMed ID: 15570073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers.
    Freitas CG; Pesavento TF; Pedrosa MR; Riera R; Torloni MR
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2016; 134(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 26313113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of scientific misconduct on the results of clinical trials: a Delphi survey.
    Al-Marzouki S; Roberts I; Marshall T; Evans S
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Jun; 26(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15911467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trial registration.
    Watts R; Cubie S
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2008 Nov; 47(11):1595-6. PubMed ID: 18927194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of voluntary and compulsory databases and registries in the United States.
    Hanto DW
    Transplantation; 2003 Jun; 75(12):2162-4. PubMed ID: 12829937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.