These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38589258)
1. Do medical specialists accept claims-based Audit and Feedback for quality improvement? A focus group study. de Weerdt V; Ybema S; Repping S; van der Hijden E; Willems H BMJ Open; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e081063. PubMed ID: 38589258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement without management: qualitative evaluation of a voluntary audit & feedback intervention for primary care teams. Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 19(1):419. PubMed ID: 31234916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acting on audit & feedback: a qualitative instrumental case study in mental health services in Norway. Pedersen MS; Landheim A; Møller M; Lien L BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 29386020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is needed to implement a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits to improve care quality: A concept mapping study among cardiac rehabilitation teams. van Engen-Verheul MM; Peek N; Haafkens JA; Joukes E; Vromen T; Jaspers MW; de Keizer NF Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():76-85. PubMed ID: 27919398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Successful implementation of a combined learning collaborative and mentoring intervention to improve neonatal quality of care in rural Rwanda. Werdenberg J; Biziyaremye F; Nyishime M; Nahimana E; Mutaganzwa C; Tugizimana D; Manzi A; Navale S; Hirschhorn LR; Magge H BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Dec; 18(1):941. PubMed ID: 30514294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unpacking the intention to action gap: a qualitative study understanding how physicians engage with audit and feedback. Desveaux L; Ivers NM; Devotta K; Ramji N; Weyman K; Kiran T Implement Sci; 2021 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 33596946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conditions and barriers for quality improvement work: a qualitative study of how professionals and health centre managers experience audit and feedback practices in Swedish primary care. Arvidsson E; Dahlin S; Anell A BMC Fam Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(1):113. PubMed ID: 34126935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial. Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; de Jonge E; Peek N; Dongelmans DA; de Keizer NF Implement Sci; 2017 May; 12(1):68. PubMed ID: 28545535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audit and feedback in mental healthcare: staff experiences. Pedersen MS; Landheim A; Møller M; Lien L Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Aug; 31(7):822-833. PubMed ID: 30354880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback. Grimshaw JM; Ivers N; Linklater S; Foy R; Francis JJ; Gude WT; Hysong SJ; BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 May; 28(5):416-423. PubMed ID: 30852557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Walking the line between assessment, improvement and learning: a qualitative study on opportunities and risks of incorporating peer discussion of audit and feedback within quality improvement in general practice. van der Winden D; van Dijk N; Visser MRM; Bont J BMJ Open; 2023 Jan; 13(1):e066793. PubMed ID: 36720571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model depicting aspects of audit and feedback that impact physicians' acceptance of clinical performance feedback. Payne VL; Hysong SJ BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():260. PubMed ID: 27412170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care. Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Peek N; de Keizer NF Implement Sci; 2019 Sep; 14(1):90. PubMed ID: 31533841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting and design elements of audit and feedback interventions: a secondary review. Colquhoun H; Michie S; Sales A; Ivers N; Grimshaw JM; Carroll K; Chalifoux M; Eva K; Brehaut J BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Jan; 26(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 26811541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial). Stephens TJ; Peden CJ; Pearse RM; Shaw SE; Abbott TEF; Jones EL; Kocman D; Martin G; Implement Sci; 2018 Nov; 13(1):142. PubMed ID: 30424818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening. Lawrenson JG; Graham-Rowe E; Lorencatto F; Burr J; Bunce C; Francis JJ; Aluko P; Rice S; Vale L; Peto T; Presseau J; Ivers N; Grimshaw JM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD012054. PubMed ID: 29333660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empowering Implementation Teams with a Learning Health System Approach: Leveraging Data to Improve Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack. Rattray NA; Damush TM; Miech EJ; Homoya B; Myers LJ; Penney LS; Ferguson J; Giacherio B; Kumar M; Bravata DM J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Nov; 35(Suppl 2):823-831. PubMed ID: 32875510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Theory-based and evidence-based design of audit and feedback programmes: examples from two clinical intervention studies. Hysong SJ; Kell HJ; Petersen LA; Campbell BA; Trautner BW BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):323-334. PubMed ID: 27288054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]