These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38589554)

  • 1. Evaluating the accuracy of cerebrovascular computational fluid dynamics modeling through time-resolved experimental validation.
    Luisi CA; Witter TL; Nikoubashman O; Wiesmann M; Steinseifer U; Neidlin M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8194. PubMed ID: 38589554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the choice of outlet boundary conditions for patient-specific analysis of aortic flow using computational fluid dynamics.
    Pirola S; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Pepper JR; Athanasiou T; Xu XY
    J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 60():15-21. PubMed ID: 28673664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
    Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; van Ooij P; Veeturi SS; Tutino VM; Zwanenburg JJ; Meng H
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103759. PubMed ID: 32421656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling lower-limb peripheral arterial disease using clinically available datasets: impact of inflow boundary conditions on hemodynamic indices for restenosis prediction.
    Ninno F; Chiastra C; Colombo M; Dardik A; Strosberg D; Aboian E; Tsui J; Bartlett M; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jun; 251():108214. PubMed ID: 38759252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
    Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of inlet and outlet boundary conditions in image-based CFD modeling of aortic flow.
    Madhavan S; Kemmerling EMC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 May; 17(1):66. PubMed ID: 29843730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms.
    Sun Q; Groth A; Aach T
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):742-54. PubMed ID: 22320784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A modified method of computed fluid dynamics simulation in abdominal aorta and visceral arteries.
    Shi Y; Peng C; Liu J; Lan H; Li C; Qin W; Yuan T; Kan Y; Wang S; Fu W
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Nov; 24(15):1718-1729. PubMed ID: 34569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimizing the blood velocity differences between phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation in cerebral arteries and aneurysms.
    Mohd Adib MAH; Ii S; Watanabe Y; Wada S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Sep; 55(9):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 28161877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra-Cardiac Flow from Geometry Prescribed Computational Fluid Dynamics: Comparison with Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.
    Hvid R; Stuart MB; Jensen JA; Traberg MS
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Aug; 14(4):489-504. PubMed ID: 37322241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
    Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using DFT on ultrasound measurements to determine patient-specific blood flow boundary conditions for computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
    Yi H; Yang Z; Bramlage L; Ludwig B
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 176():108563. PubMed ID: 38761498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational Study of Anatomical Risk Factors in Idealized Models of Type B Aortic Dissection.
    Ben Ahmed S; Dillon-Murphy D; Figueroa CA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 52(6):736-745. PubMed ID: 27561609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Side Branches on the Computation of Fractional Flow in Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Using the Computational Fluid Dynamics Method.
    Liu H; Lan L; Leng X; Ip HL; Leung TWH; Wang D; Wong KS
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Jan; 27(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 29107636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of blood viscosity models and boundary conditions on the computation of hemodynamic parameters in cerebral aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics.
    Yang H; Hong I; Kim YB; Cho KC; Oh JH
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 36624234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physics-driven CFD modeling of complex anatomical cardiovascular flows-a TCPC case study.
    Pekkan K; de Zélicourt D; Ge L; Sotiropoulos F; Frakes D; Fogel MA; Yoganathan AP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 33(3):284-300. PubMed ID: 15868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data.
    Rutkowski DR; Roldán-Alzate A; Johnson KM
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10240. PubMed ID: 33986368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
    Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
    Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling of contrast transport in basilar aneurysms following flow-altering surgeries.
    Vali A; Abla AA; Lawton MT; Saloner D; Rayz VL
    J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 50():195-201. PubMed ID: 27890537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.