These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38589613)

  • 1. Response accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 Copilot and Gemini in interpreting biochemical laboratory data a pilot study.
    Kaftan AN; Hussain MK; Naser FH
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8233. PubMed ID: 38589613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of information about urologic pathology in English and Spanish from ChatGPT, BARD, and Copilot.
    Szczesniewski JJ; Ramos Alba A; Rodríguez Castro PM; Lorenzo Gómez MF; Sainz González J; Llanes González L
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Jun; 48(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 38373482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysing the Applicability of ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing to Generate Reasoning-Based Multiple-Choice Questions in Medical Physiology.
    Agarwal M; Sharma P; Goswami A
    Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40977. PubMed ID: 37519497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
    Kumari A; Kumari A; Singh A; Singh SK; Juhi A; Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Mondal H
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large language models as assistance for glaucoma surgical cases: a ChatGPT vs. Google Gemini comparison.
    Carlà MM; Gambini G; Baldascino A; Boselli F; Giannuzzi F; Margollicci F; Rizzo S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; 262(9):2945-2959. PubMed ID: 38573349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.
    Giannakopoulos K; Kavadella A; Aaqel Salim A; Stamatopoulos V; Kaklamanos EG
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51580. PubMed ID: 38009003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capacity of Generative AI to Interpret Human Emotions From Visual and Textual Data: Pilot Evaluation Study.
    Elyoseph Z; Refoua E; Asraf K; Lvovsky M; Shimoni Y; Hadar-Shoval D
    JMIR Ment Health; 2024 Feb; 11():e54369. PubMed ID: 38319707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses of Five Different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to the Top Searched Queries About Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Analysis.
    Şahin MF; Ateş H; Keleş A; Özcan R; Doğan Ç; Akgül M; Yazıcı CM
    J Med Syst; 2024 Apr; 48(1):38. PubMed ID: 38568432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical questions on advanced life support answered by artificial intelligence. A comparison between ChatGPT, Google Bard and Microsoft Copilot.
    Semeraro F; Gamberini L; Carmona F; Monsieurs KG
    Resuscitation; 2024 Feb; 195():110114. PubMed ID: 38211808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Bing Search, and Google Bard) in Solving Case Vignettes in Physiology.
    Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Dhokane N; Sorte SR; Kumari A; Mondal H
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e42972. PubMed ID: 37671207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AI-Powered Renal Diet Support: Performance of ChatGPT, Bard AI, and Bing Chat.
    Qarajeh A; Tangpanithandee S; Thongprayoon C; Suppadungsuk S; Krisanapan P; Aiumtrakul N; Garcia Valencia OA; Miao J; Qureshi F; Cheungpasitporn W
    Clin Pract; 2023 Sep; 13(5):1160-1172. PubMed ID: 37887080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the problem-solving performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Korean emergency medicine board examination question bank.
    Lee GU; Hong DY; Kim SY; Kim JW; Lee YH; Park SO; Lee KR
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Mar; 103(9):e37325. PubMed ID: 38428889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing AI, and Bard Against Conventional Drug-Drug Interactions Clinical Tools.
    Al-Ashwal FY; Zawiah M; Gharaibeh L; Abu-Farha R; Bitar AN
    Drug Healthc Patient Saf; 2023; 15():137-147. PubMed ID: 37750052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can artificial intelligence replace biochemists? A study comparing interpretation of thyroid function test results by ChatGPT and Google Bard to practising biochemists.
    Stevenson E; Walsh C; Hibberd L
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2024 Mar; 61(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 37699796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does artificial intelligence master urological board examinations? A comparative analysis of different Large Language Models' accuracy and reliability in the 2022 In-Service Assessment of the European Board of Urology.
    Kollitsch L; Eredics K; Marszalek M; Rauchenwald M; Brookman-May SD; Burger M; Körner-Riffard K; May M
    World J Urol; 2024 Jan; 42(1):20. PubMed ID: 38197996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pilot Testing of a Tool to Standardize the Assessment of the Quality of Health Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models.
    Sallam M; Barakat M; Sallam M
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49373. PubMed ID: 38024074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the accuracy and completeness of artificial intelligence language models in providing information on methotrexate use.
    Coskun BN; Yagiz B; Ocakoglu G; Dalkilic E; Pehlivan Y
    Rheumatol Int; 2024 Mar; 44(3):509-515. PubMed ID: 37747564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potentials and pitfalls of ChatGPT and natural-language artificial intelligence models for the understanding of laboratory medicine test results. An assessment by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group on Artificial Intelligence (WG-AI).
    Cadamuro J; Cabitza F; Debeljak Z; De Bruyne S; Frans G; Perez SM; Ozdemir H; Tolios A; Carobene A; Padoan A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Jun; 61(7):1158-1166. PubMed ID: 37083166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.
    Mediboina A; Badam RK; Chodavarapu S
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e51544. PubMed ID: 38318564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard.
    Rahsepar AA; Tavakoli N; Kim GHJ; Hassani C; Abtin F; Bedayat A
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e230922. PubMed ID: 37310252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.