These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38590103)
1. Advancing unanchored simulated treatment comparisons: A novel implementation and simulation study. Ren S; Ren S; Welton NJ; Strong M Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 38590103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Jiang Z; Cappelleri JC; Gamalo M; Chen Y; Thomas N; Chu H Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):671-686. PubMed ID: 38380799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) for the evidence synthesis of single-arm trials with time-to-event outcomes. Jiang Y; Ni W BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):241. PubMed ID: 32993519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal. Phillippo DM; Ades AE; Dias S; Palmer S; Abrams KR; Welton NJ Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):200-211. PubMed ID: 28823204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Remiro-Azócar A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):217. PubMed ID: 35941551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for population adjustment with limited access to individual patient data: A review and simulation study. Remiro-Azócar A; Heath A; Baio G Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):750-775. PubMed ID: 34196111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unanchored Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methods for Time-to-Event Outcomes Using Inverse Odds Weighting, Regression Adjustment, and Doubly Robust Methods With Either Individual Patient or Aggregate Data. Park JE; Campbell H; Towle K; Yuan Y; Jansen JP; Phillippo D; Cope S Value Health; 2024 Mar; 27(3):278-286. PubMed ID: 38135212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals. Phillippo DM; Dias S; Elsada A; Ades AE; Welton NJ Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 31190671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment-Schedule Matching in Unanchored Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Progression-Free Survival in Cancer Studies. Kapetanakis V; Prawitz T; Schlichting M; Ishak KJ; Phatak H; Kearney M; Stevens JW; Benedict A; Bharmal M Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Dec; 37(12):1537-1551. PubMed ID: 31555968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Adjusted and Unadjusted Indirect Comparison Methods in Benefit Assessment. A Simulation Study for Time-to-event Endpoints. Kühnast S; Schiffner-Rohe J; Rahnenführer J; Leverkus F Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):261-267. PubMed ID: 28361159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Equivalence of entropy balancing and the method of moments for matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Phillippo DM; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):568-572. PubMed ID: 32395870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How Assessment-Schedule Matching Limits Bias When Comparing Progression-Free Survival in Single-Arm Studies: An Application in Second-Line Urothelial Carcinoma Treatments. Kapetanakis V; Prawitz T; Schlichting M; Ishak KJ; Phatak H; Yu T; Bharmal M Value Health; 2021 Aug; 24(8):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 34372979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative Weighting Approaches for Anchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons via a Common Comparator. Petto H; Kadziola Z; Brnabic A; Saure D; Belger M Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 30661638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study. Phillippo DM; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(30):4885-4911. PubMed ID: 33015906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Methods for Estimating Therapy Effects by Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study. Weber D; Jensen K; Kieser M Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):644-654. PubMed ID: 32659160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Four alternative methodologies for simulated treatment comparison: How could the use of simulation be re-invigorated? Zhang L; Bujkiewicz S; Jackson D Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):227-241. PubMed ID: 38104969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods for Indirect Treatment Comparison: Results from a Systematic Literature Review. Macabeo B; Quenéchdu A; Aballéa S; François C; Boyer L; Laramée P J Mark Access Health Policy; 2024 Jun; 12(2):58-80. PubMed ID: 38660413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effects of Model Misspecification in Unanchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison: Results of a Simulation Study. Hatswell AJ; Freemantle N; Baio G Value Health; 2020 Jun; 23(6):751-759. PubMed ID: 32540233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Risdiplam and Nusinersen in Children with Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Kokaliaris C; Evans R; Hawkins N; Mahajan A; Scott DA; Sutherland CS; Nam J; Sajeev G Adv Ther; 2024 Jun; 41(6):2414-2434. PubMed ID: 38705943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]