These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3859029)

  • 21. Evaluation of the diagnostic advantage of intraoral D and E film for detecting interproximal caries.
    Ardakani FE; Davari A; Goodarzipour D; Goodarzipour K; Fallahzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):58-70. PubMed ID: 15558091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of different developing solutions and developing times on radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 2097224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 1767370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Kodak D-speed and E-speed x-ray film in detection of proximal caries.
    Waggoner WF; Ashton JJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 3198837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitometric and clinical evaluation of a new F-speed dental X-ray film.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11175272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The evaluation of effect of developer age in the detection of approximal caries using three speed dental x-ray films: an in-vitro study.
    Madalli VB; Annigeri RG; Basavaraddi SM
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Mar; 8(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 24783146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging.
    Lundeen RC; McDavid WD; Barnwell GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Dec; 66(6):734-45. PubMed ID: 3205558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed dental x-ray film: in vitro study of the radiographic appearance of interproximal lesions.
    Kleier DJ; Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Mar; 63(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 3473366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objective and subjective evaluations of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray film.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 7614190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of developer exhaustion on Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed dental films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 7614150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
    Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films.
    Schulze RK; Nackat D; D'hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 15088040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.