155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38590664)
1. Image quality evaluation for a clinical organ-targeted PET camera.
Baldassi B; Poladyan H; Shahi A; Maa-Hacquoil H; Rapley M; Komarov B; Stiles J; Freitas V; Waterston M; Aseyev O; Reznik A; Bubon O
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1268991. PubMed ID: 38590664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Organ-Targeted PET Camera.
Stiles J; Baldassi B; Bubon O; Poladyan H; Freitas V; Scaranelo A; Mulligan AM; Waterston M; Reznik A
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of a whole-body prototype PET scanner with four-layer DOI detectors.
Akamatsu G; Tashima H; Iwao Y; Wakizaka H; Maeda T; Mohammadi A; Takyu S; Nitta M; Nishikido F; Rutherford H; Chacon A; Safavi-Naeini M; Yoshida E; Yamaya T
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(9):095014. PubMed ID: 30978704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.
Spencer BA; Berg E; Schmall JP; Omidvari N; Leung EK; Abdelhafez YG; Tang S; Deng Z; Dong Y; Lv Y; Bao J; Liu W; Li H; Jones T; Badawi RD; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):861-870. PubMed ID: 33008932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of the inveon dedicated PET preclinical tomograph based on the NEMA NU-4 standards.
Bao Q; Newport D; Chen M; Stout DB; Chatziioannou AF
J Nucl Med; 2009 Mar; 50(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 19223424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards.
Miyake KK; Matsumoto K; Inoue M; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Oishi T; Kawase S; Kitamura K; Yamakawa Y; Akazawa A; Kobayashi T; Ohi J; Togashi K
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 55(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 24812244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PET performance evaluation of the small-animal Hyperion II
Hallen P; Schug D; Weissler B; Gebhardt P; Salomon A; Kiessling F; Schulz V
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2018 Nov; 4(6):065027. PubMed ID: 30675384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dedicated phantom design for positron emission mammography performance evaluation.
Torres-Urzúa LF; Alva-Sánchez H; Martínez-Dávalos A; García-Pérez FO; Peruyero-Rivas RM; Rodríguez-Villafuerte M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245003. PubMed ID: 32693400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fluorine-18 and bromine-76 imaging in positron emission tomography.
Ribeiro MJ; Almeida P; Strul D; Ferreira N; Loc'h C; Brulon V; Trébossen R; Mazière B; Bendriem B
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 26(7):758-66. PubMed ID: 10398824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NEMA NU-4 2008 performance evaluation of Xtrim-PET: A prototype SiPM-based preclinical scanner.
Amirrashedi M; Sarkar S; Ghafarian P; Hashemi Shahraki R; Geramifar P; Zaidi H; Ay MR
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4816-4825. PubMed ID: 31448421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Setup and characterisation according to NEMA NU 4 of the
Hinz C; Jahnke S; Metzner R; Pflugfelder D; Scheins J; Streun M; Koller R
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38271724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DH-Mammo PET: a dual-head positron emission mammography system for breast imaging.
Shi Y; Wang Y; Zhou J; Zhu Y; Lyu X; Hui H; Wen B; Liu Y; Li L; Li J; Meng F; Kang F; Zhu S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(20):. PubMed ID: 36126658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II.
MacDonald L; Edwards J; Lewellen T; Haseley D; Rogers J; Kinahan P
J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1666-75. PubMed ID: 19759118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance evaluation of the MOLECUBES β-CUBE-a high spatial resolution and high sensitivity small animal PET scanner utilizing monolithic LYSO scintillation detectors.
Krishnamoorthy S; Blankemeyer E; Mollet P; Surti S; Van Holen R; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(15):155013. PubMed ID: 29938684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a PSPMT based detector for scintimammography.
Williams MB; Williams MB; Goode AR; Galbis-Reig V; Majewski S; Weisenberger AG; Wojcik R
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):781-800. PubMed ID: 10730971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance Evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT System According to the NEMA NU2-2012 Standard.
Rausch I; Ruiz A; Valverde-Pascual I; Cal-González J; Beyer T; Carrio I
J Nucl Med; 2019 Apr; 60(4):561-567. PubMed ID: 30361382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An extended bore length solid-state digital-BGO PET/CT system: design, preliminary experience, and performance characteristics.
Kennedy JA; Palchan-Hazan T; Maronnier Q; Caselles O; Courbon F; Levy M; Keidar Z
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Mar; 51(4):954-964. PubMed ID: 38012446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 18F-FDG-PET partial volume effect correction using a modified recovery coefficient approach based on functional volume and local contrast: physical validation and clinical feasibility in oncology.
Anouan KJ; Lelandais B; Edet-Sanson A; Ruan S; Vera P; Gardin I; Hapdey S
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Sep; 61(3):301-313. PubMed ID: 26407135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance evaluation of the Trans-PET® BioCaliburn® LH system: a large FOV small-animal PET system.
Wang L; Zhu J; Liang X; Niu M; Wu X; Kao CM; Kim H; Xie Q
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 25479202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
