These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38591262)

  • 1. Guilt and Reproductive Decision-Making in Patients With Inherited Cardiac Diseases.
    Smith E; Krishnamoorthy D; Burke-Martindale C; Weissler-Snir A
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e032696. PubMed ID: 38591262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do Individuals With Inherited Cardiac Diseases Experience Reproductive Decision-Making Guilt?
    Tucker CA; Osteen K
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e034620. PubMed ID: 38591340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of the postcounseling reproductive decision-making process: an explorative study.
    Frets PG; Verhage F; Niermeijer MF
    Am J Med Genet; 1991 Sep; 40(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 1951432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation in patients with inherited heart diseases.
    Butters A; Isbister JC; Medi C; Raju H; Turner C; Sy RW; Semsarian C; Ingles J
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):465-473. PubMed ID: 31930598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ICD for primary prevention in patients with inherited cardiac diseases: indications, use, and outcome: a comparison with secondary prevention.
    Olde Nordkamp LR; Wilde AA; Tijssen JG; Knops RE; van Dessel PF; de Groot JR
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Feb; 6(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 23275262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on pro-environmental decision making.
    Schneider CR; Zaval L; Weber EU; Markowitz EM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188781. PubMed ID: 29190758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-Focused Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making: Comparing the Effects of Regulated and Unregulated Guilt, Shame, and Embarrassment.
    Higgs C; McIntosh T; Connelly S; Mumford M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Feb; 26(1):27-63. PubMed ID: 30607699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision-making and experiences of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in inherited heart diseases: a qualitative study.
    Yeates L; McDonald K; Burns C; Semsarian C; Carter S; Ingles J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Feb; 30(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 34545210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic Testing in Inherited Heart Diseases.
    Ingles J; Macciocca I; Morales A; Thomson K
    Heart Lung Circ; 2020 Apr; 29(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 31813745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MicroRNAs in Cardiac Diseases.
    Colpaert RMW; Calore M
    Cells; 2019 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 31323768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness.
    Cohen TR; Wolf ST; Panter AT; Insko CA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 May; 100(5):947-66. PubMed ID: 21517196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.
    Migliore S; D'Aurizio G; Parisi F; Maffi S; Squitieri B; Curcio G; Mancini F
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Aug; 122(4):1395-1411. PubMed ID: 30025498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social-economical decision making in current and remitted major depression.
    Pulcu E; Thomas EJ; Trotter PD; McFarquhar M; Juhasz G; Sahakian BJ; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Zahn R; Elliott R
    Psychol Med; 2015 Apr; 45(6):1301-13. PubMed ID: 25300570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical issues in the management of geriatric cardiac patients.
    Lipman HI
    Am J Geriatr Cardiol; 2006; 15(6):379-81. PubMed ID: 17086033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiolaminopathies from bench to bedside: challenges in clinical decision-making with focus on arrhythmia-related outcomes.
    Boriani G; Biagini E; Ziacchi M; Malavasi VL; Vitolo M; Talarico M; Mauro E; Gorlato G; Lattanzi G
    Nucleus; 2018; 9(1):442-459. PubMed ID: 30130999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "You do not get cancer by chance": Communicating the role of environmental causes in cancer diseases and the risk of a "guilt rhetoric".
    Oliveri S; Scotto L; Ongaro G; Triberti S; Guiddi P; Pravettoni G
    Psychooncology; 2019 Dec; 28(12):2422-2424. PubMed ID: 31512349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The standard criminal concept of guilt between free will and neurobiological determinism (I)].
    Czerner F
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(3-4):65-88. PubMed ID: 17067088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsibility, guilt, and decision under risk.
    Mancini F; Gangemi A
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Dec; 93(3 Pt 2):1077-9. PubMed ID: 14765573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vividness in judgements of guilt.
    Bensi L; Nori R; Strazzari E; Giusberti F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Dec; 97(3 Pt 2):1133-6. PubMed ID: 15002857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heart Team Decision-making in Spain: Is There Room for Improvement?
    Lozano I; Rondan J; Vegas JM; Segovia E
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2016 May; 69(5):533-4. PubMed ID: 27010580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.