192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38592190)
1. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Dubuisson Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension with Laparoscopic Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Short-Term Results.
Malanowska-Jarema E; Starczewski A; Melnyk M; Oliveira D; Balzarro M; Rubillota E
J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 38592190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study in learning curves of laparoscopic lateral suspension vs. laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: preliminary results.
Malanowska-Jarema E; Osnytska Y; Starczewski A; Balzarro M; Rubilotta E
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1274178. PubMed ID: 38125583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Isenlik BS; Aksoy O; Erol O; Mulayim B
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 35737006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients.
Veit-Rubin N; Dubuisson JB; Gayet-Ageron A; Lange S; Eperon I; Dubuisson J
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1685-1693. PubMed ID: 28417156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective double center study.
Mereu L; Tateo S; D'Alterio MN; Russo E; Giannini A; Mannella P; Pertile R; Cai T; Simoncini T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():16-20. PubMed ID: 31770687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.
Tagliaferri V; Taccaliti C; Romano F; D'Asta M; Martulli B; Gentile C; Legge F; Ruggieri S; Guido M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2075-2081. PubMed ID: 35129036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A New Gold Standard?
Dällenbach P
Front Surg; 2022; 9():898392. PubMed ID: 36034345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with a five-arm mesh in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Akbaba E; Sezgin B
BMC Womens Health; 2021 Jun; 21(1):244. PubMed ID: 34130664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique.
Chatziioannidou K; Veit-Rubin N; Dällenbach P
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):319-325. PubMed ID: 33835212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Li C; Dai Z; Shu H
Trials; 2018 Mar; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 29506566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uterine-sparing laparoscopic lateral suspension in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Kumbasar S; Salman S; Sogut O; K Gencer F; Bacak HB; Tezcan AD; Timur GY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jan; 49(1):341-349. PubMed ID: 36196844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of Life and Sexual Function after Laparoscopic Posterior Vaginal Plication Plus Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Posterior Vaginal Prolapse.
Morciano A; Schiavi MC; Frigerio M; Licchetta G; Tinelli A; Cervigni M; Marzo G; Scambia G
J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38276122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
van Oudheusden AMJ; Eissing J; Terink IM; Vink MDH; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY; Coolen AWM
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36112182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.
Xu S; Nie J; Zeng W; Lai Y; Chen X; Yu Y
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2023 Dec; 18(4):690-697. PubMed ID: 38239581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
