BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3859327)

  • 1. Nature of relapse after surgical mandibular advancement.
    Bhatia SN; Yan B; Behbehani I; Harris M
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Apr; 12(2):58-69. PubMed ID: 3859327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular advancement procedures: predictable stability and relapse.
    Greebe RB; Tuinzing DB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 6582425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical mandibular advancement: a cephalometric analysis of treatment response.
    Lake SL; McNeill RW; Little RM; West RA
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Oct; 80(4):376-94. PubMed ID: 6945807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery.
    Eggensperger N; Smolka W; Rahal A; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 62(12):1486-96. PubMed ID: 15573348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletofacial changes by mandibular advancement using sagittal split osteotomies.
    Gomes MA; Wisth PJ; Tornes K; Bøe OE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 8228433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric analysis of postsurgical skeletal changes following mandibular advancement surgery.
    Hardy AS; Piecuch JF
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Jan; 16(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 3856287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular deficiency syndrome. III. Surgical advancement of the deficient mandible in growing children: treatment results in twelve patients.
    Schendel SA; Wolford LM; Epker BN
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Mar; 45(3):364-77. PubMed ID: 273187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing the stability of the sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Will LA; West RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Aug; 47(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 2746390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
    Thüer U; Ingervall B; Vuillemin T
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The stability of facial osteotomies. 2. Mandibular advancement with bicortical screw fixation.
    Hoffman GR; Moloney FB
    Aust Dent J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 7575273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal stability following miniplate fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Neyt L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 51(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 8450352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five year follow-up of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of syndromic children.
    Gürsoy S; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18199081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement and rigid fixation.
    Kirkpatrick TB; Woods MG; Swift JQ; Markowitz NR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Jul; 45(7):572-6. PubMed ID: 3474373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone mineral density and mandibular advancement as contributing factors for postoperative relapse after orthognathic surgery in patients with preoperative idiopathic condylar resorption: a prospective study with preliminary 1-year follow-up.
    Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Aug; 120(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 25971872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sagittal split advancement osteotomy: comparison of the tendency to relapse after two different methods of rigid fixation.
    Kahnberg KE; Kashani H; Owman-Moll P
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2007; 41(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 17701729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.
    Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):368-81. PubMed ID: 11298310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical treatment of mandibular retrusion by a post-condylar cartilage graft.
    Banks P; Haider SM
    Br Dent J; 1989 Jun; 166(12):443-50. PubMed ID: 2751909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary assessment of skeletal stability after sagittal split mandibular advancement using a bioresorbable fixation system.
    Matthews NS; Khambay BS; Ayoub AF; Koppel D; Wood G
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 41(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 12804543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
    Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 3-year evaluation of skeletal stability of mandibular advancement with rigid fixation.
    Kierl MJ; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Jun; 48(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 2341939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.