143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38593745)
1. Effectiveness of recombinant human FSH: recombinant human LH combination treatment versus recombinant human FSH alone for assisted reproductive technology in women aged 35-40 years.
Bielfeld AP; Schwarze JE; Verpillat P; Lispi M; Fischer R; Hayward B; Chuderland D; D'Hooghe T; Krussel JS
Reprod Biomed Online; 2024 Jun; 48(6):103725. PubMed ID: 38593745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.
Humaidan P; Chin W; Rogoff D; D'Hooghe T; Longobardi S; Hubbard J; Schertz J;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):544-555. PubMed ID: 28137754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH): recombinant human luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone in assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles among women aged 35-40 years: A German database study.
Bielfeld AP; Schwarze JE; Verpillat P; Lispi M; Fischer R; Hayward B; Chuderland D; D'Hooghe T; Krussel JS
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jul; 89():102350. PubMed ID: 37320996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Conforti A; Esteves SC; Humaidan P; Longobardi S; D'Hooghe T; Orvieto R; Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM; Zullo F; Alviggi C
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2021 Jun; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 34154604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lehert P; Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Schertz J; Saunders H; Arriagada P; Copt S; Tarlatzis B
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Feb; 12():17. PubMed ID: 24555766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation.
Koloda Y; Korsak V; Rozenson O; Anshina M; Sagamonova K; Baranov I; Yakovenko S; D'Hooghe T; Ershova A; Lispi M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Dec; 85(Pt B):134-148. PubMed ID: 35216907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.
Chen MJ; Yi YC; Guu HF; Chen YF; Kung HF; Chang JC; Chuan ST; Chen LY
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():931756. PubMed ID: 36046790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment.
Marrs R; Meldrum D; Muasher S; Schoolcraft W; Werlin L; Kelly E
Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Feb; 8(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 14989794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.
Alviggi C; Conforti A; Esteves SC; Andersen CY; Bosch E; Bühler K; Ferraretti AP; De Placido G; Mollo A; Fischer R; Humaidan P;
Fertil Steril; 2018 Apr; 109(4):644-664. PubMed ID: 29653717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.
Vuong TN; Phung HT; Ho MT
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1188-95. PubMed ID: 25740882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles.
Mochtar MH; Danhof NA; Ayeleke RO; Van der Veen F; van Wely M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD005070. PubMed ID: 28537052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.
Bühler KF; Fischer R; Verpillat P; Allignol A; Guedes S; Boutmy E; Bilger W; Richter E; D'Hooghe T
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2021 Jun; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 34134695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A direct healthcare cost analysis of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.
Chang JC; Yi YC; Chen YF; Guu HF; Kung HF; Chen LY; Chuan ST; Chang YM; Chen MJ
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Feb; 309(2):699-706. PubMed ID: 38099955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recombinant human LH supplementation versus supplementation with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: a matched case-control study.
Bühler KF; Fischer R
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 May; 28(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 22115012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioequivalence of recombinant human FSH and recombinant human LH in a fixed 2:1 combination: two phase I, randomised, crossover studies.
Picard M; Rossier C; Papasouliotis O; Lugan I
Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Apr; 24(4):1199-208. PubMed ID: 18348746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-follicular LH supplementation in women aged 35-39 years undergoing ICSI cycles: a randomized controlled study.
Matorras R; Prieto B; Exposito A; Mendoza R; Crisol L; Herranz P; Burgués S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2009 Dec; 19(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 20031032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of recombinant human LH (lutropin alfa) in the late stimulation phase of assisted reproduction cycles: a double-blind, randomized, prospective study.
Tarlatzis B; Tavmergen E; Szamatowicz M; Barash A; Amit A; Levitas E; Shoham Z
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 16172149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction.
Pouwer AW; Farquhar C; Kremer JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 2015(7):CD009577. PubMed ID: 26171903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and safety of follitropin alfa (Ovaleap®) for ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol in real-world clinical practice: a multicenter, prospective, open, non-interventional assisted reproductive technology study.
Sydow P; Gmeinwieser N; Pribbernow K; Keck C; Wiegratz I
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 May; 18(1):54. PubMed ID: 32456636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin) HP) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The French Multicentre Trialists.
Frydman R; Howles CM; Truong F
Hum Reprod; 2000 Mar; 15(3):520-5. PubMed ID: 10686190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
