These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cleaning and modification of intraorally contaminated titanium discs with calcium phosphate powder abrasive treatment. Tastepe CS; Liu Y; Visscher CM; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1238-46. PubMed ID: 22882522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re-establishment of Biocompatibility of the In Vitro Contaminated Titanium Surface Using Osteoconductive Powders With Air-Abrasive Treatment. Tastepe CS; Lin X; Donnet M; Doulabi BZ; Wismeijer D; Liu Y J Oral Implantol; 2018 Apr; 44(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 29303415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cleaning potential of different air abrasive powders and their impact on implant surface roughness. Matsubara VH; Leong BW; Leong MJL; Lawrence Z; Becker T; Quaranta A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31837107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro corrosion behavior of bioceramic, metallic, and bioceramic-metallic coated stainless steel dental implants. Fathi MH; Salehi M; Saatchi A; Mortazavi V; Moosavi SB Dent Mater; 2003 May; 19(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 12628430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Processing-microstructure-property relations in HVOF sprayed calcium phosphate based bioceramic coatings. Khor KA; Li H; Cheang P Biomaterials; 2003 Jun; 24(13):2233-43. PubMed ID: 12699659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations. Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite. Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants. Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of intermediate ZrO2-CaO coatings deposited by cold thermal spraying on the titanium-porcelain bond in dental restorations. Marcelli E; Costantino ML; Villa T; Bagnoli P; Zannoli R; Corazza I; Cercenelli L J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1201-11. PubMed ID: 24993377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs. Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations. Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits. Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hydroxyapatite and silk combination-coated dental implants result in superior bone formation in the peri-implant area compared with hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated implants. Kweon H; Lee SW; Hahn BD; Lee YC; Kim SG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1928-36. PubMed ID: 25234528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of human dental pulp stem cell activity cultured on sandblasted titanium discs decontaminated with Er:YAG laser and air-powder abrasion: an in vitro study. Kadkhodazadeh M; Amid R; Gilvari Sarshari M; Mojahedi M; Parhizkar A Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 37(8):3259-3268. PubMed ID: 35907129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep. Langhoff JD; Voelter K; Scharnweber D; Schnabelrauch M; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Kalchofner K; Nuss K; von Rechenberg B Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18977118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]