These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38594939)

  • 1. A Model-Based Approach to the Disentanglement and Differential Treatment of Engaged and Disengaged Item Omissions.
    Ulitzsch E; Zhang S; Pohl S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(3):599-619. PubMed ID: 38594939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Response Times for Joint Modeling of Response and Omission Behavior.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(3):425-453. PubMed ID: 31448968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times.
    Molenaar D; de Boeck P
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):279-297. PubMed ID: 29392567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cognitive model of response omissions in distraction paradigms.
    Damaso KAM; Castro SC; Todd J; Strayer DL; Provost A; Matzke D; Heathcote A
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):962-978. PubMed ID: 34950999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When Nonresponse Mechanisms Change: Effects on Trends and Group Comparisons in International Large-Scale Assessments.
    Sachse KA; Mahler N; Pohl S
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):699-726. PubMed ID: 32655180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for careless and insufficient effort responding in large-scale survey data-development, evaluation, and application of a screen-time-based weighting procedure.
    Ulitzsch E; Shin HJ; Lüdtke O
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):804-825. PubMed ID: 36867339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Taking the Missing Propensity Into Account When Estimating Competence Scores: Evaluation of Item Response Theory Models for Nonignorable Omissions.
    Köhler C; Pohl S; Carstensen CH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):850-874. PubMed ID: 29795844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medication omission rates in New Zealand residential aged care homes: a national description.
    Garratt SM; Kerse NM; Peri K; Jonas MF
    BMC Geriatr; 2020 Aug; 20(1):276. PubMed ID: 32758212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Multilevel Mixture IRT Framework for Modeling Response Times as Predictors or Indicators of Response Engagement in IRT Models.
    Nagy G; Ulitzsch E
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):845-879. PubMed ID: 35989730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M; Jeon M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2325-2344. PubMed ID: 29322400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2021 Dec; 11(4):1653-1687. PubMed ID: 34940395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.
    Ulitzsch E; Pohl S; Khorramdel L; Kroehne U; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):593-619. PubMed ID: 34855118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An explanatory mixture IRT model for careless and insufficient effort responding in self-report measures.
    Ulitzsch E; Yildirim-Erbasli SN; Gorgun G; Bulut O
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):668-698. PubMed ID: 35730351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.