129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38594974)
1. Three-part scoring system (tripartite) for teledermatology versus International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria to interpret patch test readings: A comparative, observational study.
Jasly K; Goyal S; Ashwini PK; Kanthraj GR; Chethana SG; Ranugha S
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2024 Apr; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38594974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Allergy patch test reading from photographic images: disagreement on ICDRG grading but agreement on simplified tripartite reading.
Ivens U; Serup J; O'goshi K
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 17250541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-rater variability in patch test readings and final interpretation using store-forward teledermatology.
Goodier MC; DeKoven JG; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Zug KA; Hylwa SA; Warshaw EM
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Sep; 85(3):274-284. PubMed ID: 33837533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of Store and Forward Teledermatology for Skin Patch Test Readings.
Grey KR; Hagen SL; Hylwa SA; Warshaw EM
Dermatitis; 2017; 28(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 28169849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of patch test positivity after 24 and 48 hours of occlusion time in patients of allergic contact dermatitis: A prospective study.
Ahuja R; Bhari N; Sethuraman G; Kalaivani M; Verma K
Contact Dermatitis; 2024 Jul; 91(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38500308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Role of Patch Testing with Indian Cosmetic Series in Patients with Facial Pigmented Contact Dermatitis in India.
Samanta A; Agarwal K; Naskar BN; De A
Indian J Dermatol; 2021; 66(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 33911298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epicutaneous patch test results in patients with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county--a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knezević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2006; 14(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 17010264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contact eczema and "standard test"--do "International Standard Test Series" coincide with Austrian local characteristics?].
Aberer W; Reiter E; Ziegler V; Wechdorn D
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1991; 103(13):375-80. PubMed ID: 1832801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Epicutaneous Patch Test Results in Patients with Contact Dermatitis.
Kasumagic-Halilovic E; Ovcina-Kurtovic N
Med Arch; 2018 Oct; 72(4):276-279. PubMed ID: 30514994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between patch test results of natural dyes and standard allergens in batik workers with occupational contact dermatitis.
Diana EDN; Widhiati S; Mochtar M; Irawanto ME
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2022 Sep; 41(3):215-220. PubMed ID: 35771736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relevance of doubtful ("equivocal") late patch-test readings.
Carlson S; Gipson K; Nedorost S
Dermatitis; 2010; 21(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 20233549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of photo assessment in late patch test readings-A multicenter study from six European patch test clinics.
Yüksel YT; Sedeh FB; Brans R; Svedman C; Paulsen E; Gimenéz-Arnau A; Foti C; Agner T;
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 May; 84(5):283-289. PubMed ID: 33152126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiating allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by high-definition optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.
Boone MA; Jemec GB; Del Marmol V
Arch Dermatol Res; 2015 Jan; 307(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25186162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch Testing in Allergic Contact Dermatitis over the Lower Extremities.
Kumar BV; Ashwini PK; Kanthraj GR; Jayadev BB
Indian J Dermatol; 2019; 64(2):164. PubMed ID: 30983622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.
Chuchu N; Dinnes J; Takwoingi Y; Matin RN; Bayliss SE; Davenport C; Moreau JF; Bassett O; Godfrey K; O'Sullivan C; Walter FM; Motley R; Deeks JJ; Williams HC;
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Dec; 12(12):CD013193. PubMed ID: 30521686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tobramycin and antiglaucoma agents as increasing culprits of periorbital allergic contact dermatitis from topical ophthalmic medications: A 24-year study from Turkey.
Özkaya E; Keskinkaya Z; Babuna Kobaner G
Contact Dermatitis; 2023 Jul; 89(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 36994896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental contact factors in eczema and the results of patch testing Chinese patients with a modified European standard series of allergens.
Li LF; Guo J; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 15291828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
