122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38595369)
1. A CBCT Assessment of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement.
Ashil AM; Sharma A; Jose LK; Grover S; Kochar AS; Varghese ST; Sharma T; Ismail PMS
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S927-S929. PubMed ID: 38595369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional Evaluation of Interradicular Areas and Cortical Bone Thickness for Orthodontic Miniscrew Implant Placement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Dharmadeep G; Naik MK; Reddy YM; Cheruluri S; Praveen Raj K; Reddy BR
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1):S99-S104. PubMed ID: 33149438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Mini-Implant Placement Using a Computer-Aided Designed Surgical Guide, with Information of Intraoral Scan and the Use of a Cone-Beam CT.
Vasoglou G; Stefanidaki I; Apostolopoulos K; Fotakidou E; Vasoglou M
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 35735647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional radiographs versus cone-beam computed tomography in planning mini-implant placement: A systematic review.
Caetano GR; Soares MQ; Oliveira LB; Junqueira JL; Nascimento MC
J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e669-e677. PubMed ID: 36046172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
Lim WH; Lee SK; Wikesjö UM; Chun YS
Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):760-5. PubMed ID: 17584877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
Lim JE; Lim WH; Chun YS
Clin Anat; 2008 Sep; 21(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 18698651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Interdental Spaces of the Mandibular Posterior Area for Orthodontic Mini-Implants with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Kananizadeh Y; Nourizadeh A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC09-ZC12. PubMed ID: 28571251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee JA; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Park KH; Kim SH; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33526299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement.
Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular molar region: a cross-sectional study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Ho JY; Ngeow WC; Lim D; Wong CS
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(3):732-738. PubMed ID: 34184752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of mini-implant sites in the posterior maxilla using traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
Abbassy MA; Sabban HM; Hassan AH; Zawawi KH
Saudi Med J; 2015 Nov; 36(11):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26593168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography.
Alves M; Baratieri C; Nojima LI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 21303419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical analysis of successful insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in infrazygomatic crest.
He Y; Liu J; Huang R; Chen X; Jia X; Zeng N; Fan X; Huang X
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):348. PubMed ID: 37264370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
