131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38595619)
1. Accuracy of CBCT in Preoperative Assessment of Impacted Canines vs. Panoramic Radiography.
Alayyash A
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S513-S515. PubMed ID: 38595619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The assessment of impacted maxillary canine position with panoramic radiography and cone beam CT.
Jung YH; Liang H; Benson BW; Flint DJ; Cho BH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):356-60. PubMed ID: 22116130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to those of conventional radiography: An in vitro study.
Hajeer MY; Al-Homsi HK; Alfailany DT; Murad RMT
Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100639. PubMed ID: 35606269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Will supplemental cone beam computed tomography change the treatment plan of impacted maxillary canines based on 2D radiography? A prospective clinical study.
Stoustrup P; Videbæk A; Wenzel A; Matzen LH
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 37934968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary impacted canines.
Ngo CTT; Fishman LS; Rossouw PE; Wang H; Said O
Angle Orthod; 2018 Jul; 88(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29561656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis.
Wriedt S; Jaklin J; Al-Nawas B; Wehrbein H
J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Jan; 73(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 22246048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orthodontic Localization of Impacted Canines: Review of the Cutting-edge Evidence in Diagnosis and Treatment Planning Based on 3D CBCT Images.
Farha P; Nguyen M; Karanth D; Dolce C; Arqub SA
Turk J Orthod; 2023 Dec; 36(4):261-269. PubMed ID: 38164014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using cone beam computed tomography. Review of the literature.
Rossini G; Cavallini C; Cassetta M; Galluccio G; Barbato E
Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2012 Jan; 3(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22783450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.
Haney E; Gansky SA; Lee JS; Johnson E; Maki K; Miller AJ; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 20451777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional orthodontic radiographic modalities and cone-beam computed tomography for localization of impacted maxillary canine teeth.
Salari B; Tofangchiha M; Padisar P; Reda R; Zanza A; Testarelli L
Sci Prog; 2024; 107(1):368504241228077. PubMed ID: 38359866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved eruption path quantification and treatment time prognosis in alignment of impacted maxillary canines using CBCT imaging.
Schubert M; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):597-607. PubMed ID: 29846571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of methods for localization of impacted maxillary canines by panoramic radiographs.
An S; Wang J; Li J; Cheng Q; Jiang CM; Wang YT; Huang YF; Yu WJ; Gou YC; Xiao L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130129. PubMed ID: 23894190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the root apex position of impacted maxillary canines on panoramic films.
Kim SH; Son WS; Yamaguchi T; Maki K; Kim SS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):489-493. PubMed ID: 28962733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of impacted canines' localization and adjacent lateral incisors' root resorption with orthopantomography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Akkuc S; Duruk G; Duman S
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):476-486. PubMed ID: 32949336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of different radiographic methods for the localization of displaced maxillary canines.
Tsolakis AI; Kalavritinos M; Bitsanis E; Sanoudos M; Benetou V; Alexiou K; Tsiklakis K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):308-314. PubMed ID: 29407509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone-beam computed tomography or conventional radiography for localising of maxillary impacted canines?
Amintavakoli N; Spivakovsky S
Evid Based Dent; 2018 Mar; 19(1):22-23. PubMed ID: 29568018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
