These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38597029)

  • 21. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Diameter and length double objectives robust analysis of cylinder dental implant].
    Sun YY; Kong L; Liu BL; Hu KJ; Li DH; Song L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 25(4):358-61. PubMed ID: 17896491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Optimized Dental Implant Model Using Finite Element Analysis and Design of Experiment.
    Srivastava S; Sarangi SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(1):142-149. PubMed ID: 37099584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effect Of Tapered And Cylindrical Implants On Stress Distribution In Different Bone Qualities: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Omezli MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):e99–e105. PubMed ID: 31184631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Structural Design and Finite Element Simulation Analysis of Grade 3 Graded Porous Titanium Implant.
    Liu B; Xu W; Chen M; Chen D; Sun G; Zhang C; Pan Y; Lu J; Guo E; Lu X
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36077485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of different abutment diameter of implants on the peri-implant stress in the crestal bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis--In vitro study.
    Aradya A; Kumar UK; Chowdhary R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27054866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of different impactor designs on biomechanical behavior in the interface bone-implant: A comparative biomechanics study.
    Bachiri A; Djebbar N; Boutabout B; Serier B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105723. PubMed ID: 32877819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol.
    Ibrahim CRM; Sameh A; Askar O
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):331. PubMed ID: 38481220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Insertion torque of immediate wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Alsabeeha NH; Payne AG; Schwass DR; Duncan WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Oct; 43(9):e115-26. PubMed ID: 23041998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Implant Design on Stress Distribution: A Finite Element Study.
    Houshmand B; Ardakani MT; Moscowchi A; Oskoui IZ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(4):39-45. PubMed ID: 36017926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Design optimization of implant geometrical characteristics enhancing primary stability using FEA of stress distribution around dental prosthesis.
    Elleuch S; Jrad H; Kessentini A; Wali M; Dammak F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Jul; 24(9):1035-1051. PubMed ID: 33439043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.