These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38598414)

  • 41. Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens.
    Legeais JM; Werner L; Werner L; Abenhaim A; Renard G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Feb; 25(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 9951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens.
    Sergienko N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):8-9; author reply 9. PubMed ID: 18165063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Factors affecting near vision after monofocal intraocular lens implantation.
    Lim DH; Han JC; Kim MH; Chung ES; Chung TY
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 29(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 23446017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long-term reading performance in patients with bilateral dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Bohórquez V; Alarcon R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1880-6. PubMed ID: 21029896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of visual performance after implantation of 3 types of intraocular lenses: accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal.
    Tan N; Zheng D; Ye J
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 24474378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
    Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study.
    Alió JL; Tavolato M; De la Hoz F; Claramonte P; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2494-503. PubMed ID: 15617915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lens.
    Weghaupt H; Pieh S; Skorpik C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 May; 24(5):663-5. PubMed ID: 9610450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of visual function between phakic eyes and pseudophakic eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Hayashi K; Yoshida M; Manabe S; Hayashi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 20117701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity after the Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation].
    Lešták J; Pitrová Š; Fůs M; Žáková M
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2017; 73(4):127-133. PubMed ID: 29589459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spherical aberration and depth of focus.
    Beiko G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1641; author reply 1641-2. PubMed ID: 18762087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens with the new generation monofocal lens using defocus curve.
    Yangzes S; Kamble N; Grewal S; Grewal SPS
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 68(12):3025-3029. PubMed ID: 33229691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens.
    Heatley CJ; Spalton DJ; Hancox J; Kumar A; Marshall J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 15992754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Vingolo EM; Grenga P; Iacobelli L; Grenga R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1244-7. PubMed ID: 17586381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Outcomes after accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens implantation.
    Pallikaris IG; Portaliou DM; Kymionis GD; Panagopoulou SI; Kounis GA
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 30(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 24972406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes.
    Javitt JC; Steinert RF
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Nov; 107(11):2040-8. PubMed ID: 11054329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: metaanalysis.
    Takakura A; Iyer P; Adams JR; Pepin SM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):380-8. PubMed ID: 20202533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. All-distance visual acuity and contrast visual acuity in eyes with a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with minimal added power.
    Hayashi K; Yoshida M; Hayashi H
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 19152978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Visual and optical performance with two different diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses compared to a monofocal lens.
    Alió JL; Piñero DP; Plaza-Puche AB; Amparo F; Jiménez R; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Javaloy J
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Aug; 27(8):570-81. PubMed ID: 21210572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.