These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38599075)
1. Performance evaluation of commercial and non-commercial shear wave elastography implementations for vascular applications. Pruijssen JT; Schreuder FHBM; Wilbers J; Kaanders JHAM; de Korte CL; Hansen HHG Ultrasonics; 2024 May; 140():107312. PubMed ID: 38599075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage. Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of shear wave elastography among operators, machines, and probes in an elasticity phantom. Alrashed AI; Alfuraih AM Ultrasonography; 2021 Jan; 40(1):158-166. PubMed ID: 32660213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Point shear wave ultrasound elastography with Esaote compared to real-time 2D shear wave elastography with supersonic imagine for the quantification of liver stiffness. Mulazzani L; Salvatore V; Ravaioli F; Allegretti G; Matassoni F; Granata R; Ferrarini A; Stefanescu H; Piscaglia F J Ultrasound; 2017 Sep; 20(3):213-225. PubMed ID: 28900522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study. Chen Q; Shi B; Zheng Y; Hu X Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():943844. PubMed ID: 36004380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study. Shin HJ; Kim MJ; Kim HY; Roh YH; Lee MJ Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3361-7. PubMed ID: 26815368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anthropomorphic Carotid Artery Phantom for Ultrasound Flow and Vessel Wall Elastography Imaging. Almutairi FF; Alyami JH Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(11):1324-1336. PubMed ID: 36752295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography. Long Z; Tradup DJ; Song P; Stekel SF; Chen S; Glazebrook KN; Hangiandreou NJ J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):336-342. PubMed ID: 29542277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Assessment of the Liver: A Direct Comparison With Point Shear Wave Elastography in Healthy Volunteers. Fang C; Konstantatou E; Romanos O; Yusuf GT; Quinlan DJ; Sidhu PS J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 28370146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arterial Stiffness Estimation by Shear Wave Elastography: Validation in Phantoms with Mechanical Testing. Maksuti E; Widman E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Larsson M; Bjällmark A Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):308-21. PubMed ID: 26454623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability of Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography in a Phantom Model. Lee J; Yoon SK; Cho JH; Kwon HJ; Kim DW; Lee JW J Korean Soc Radiol; 2023 Sep; 84(5):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 37869125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superficial ultrasound shear wave speed measurements in soft and hard elasticity phantoms: repeatability and reproducibility using two ultrasound systems. Dillman JR; Chen S; Davenport MS; Zhao H; Urban MW; Song P; Watcharotone K; Carson PL Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 25249389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography: a new method comparable to acoustic radiation force impulse imaging? Schellhaas B; Strobel D; Wildner D; Goertz RS; Neurath MF; Pfeifer L Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):723-729. PubMed ID: 28118179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra- and inter-observer variation and accuracy using different shear wave elastography methods to assess circumscribed objects - a phantom study. Seliger G; Chaoui K; Kunze C; Dridi Y; Jenderka KV; Wienke A; Tchirikov M Med Ultrason; 2017 Nov; 19(4):357-365. PubMed ID: 29197911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four different Shear Wave Elastography platforms according to abdominal wall thickness in liver fibrosis evaluation: a phantom study. Lee SM; Chang W; Kang HJ; Ahn SJ; Lee JH; Lee JM Med Ultrason; 2019 Feb; 21(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 30779827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the arterial stiffness in patients with acute ischemic stroke using longitudinal elasticity modulus measurements obtained with Shear Wave Elastography. Li Z; Du L; Wang F; Luo X Med Ultrason; 2016 Jun; 18(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 27239652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcranial Shear Wave Elastography of Neonatal and Infant Brains for Quantitative Evaluation of Increased Intracranial Pressure. Dirrichs T; Meiser N; Panek A; Trepels-Kottek S; Orlikowsky T; Kuhl CK; Schrading S Invest Radiol; 2019 Nov; 54(11):719-727. PubMed ID: 31464808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shear wave speed measurement bias in a viscoelastic phantom across six ultrasound elastography systems: a comparative study with transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography. Kishimoto R; Suga M; Usumura M; Iijima H; Yoshida M; Hachiya H; Shiina T; Yamakawa M; Konno K; Obata T; Yamaguchi T J Med Ultrason (2001); 2022 Apr; 49(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 35061118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial Stiffness Assessment in Healthy Participants Using Shear Wave Elastography. Alyami J; Almutairi F Curr Med Imaging; 2022; 18(10):1086-1092. PubMed ID: 35430974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]