These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis. Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study. Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Holdaway RA Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Facial soft tissue values in Persian adults with normal occlusion and well-balanced faces. Taki AA; Oguz F; Abuhijleh E Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):491-4. PubMed ID: 19413374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A cephalometric comparison of maxillary and mandibular incisor teeth position and soft tissue profile]. Seren E Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 2101665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method for locating anterior skeletal landmarks from soft tissue measurements. Ligthelm-Bakker AS; Prahl-Andersen B; Wattel E; Uljee IH J Biol Buccale; 1991 Dec; 19(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 1791165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A cephalometric comparison of skeletal profile and soft tissue profile on adults with normal occlusion]. Seren E Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 2101666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients. Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anterior malocclusion and soft tissue profile related to sound production and self-concept. Centofante DM; Brittin ME; Williams BH Angle Orthod; 1982 Oct; 52(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 6961833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The use of regression functions for reconstruction of the cutaneous profile, from facial bone elements]. Deloison Y; Fenart R Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Nov; 98 Suppl 1():85-8. PubMed ID: 9471707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults. Sahin Sağlam AM Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in the facial profile following insertion of complete dentures. Fanibunda KB; Allcock GC; Thomason JM Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):143-9. PubMed ID: 12526270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Morphological changes in the maxillo-facial structures during orthodontic treatment. Changes in skeletal pattern, incisor axis and soft tissues and their correlations]. Usui E; Tejima M; Aoki K; Harazaki M; Yamaguchi H; Sebata M Shikwa Gakuho; 1985 Mar; 85(3):381-94. PubMed ID: 3860959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]