128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38600674)
1. Comparison of two autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies in patients with multiple myeloma: CE plus G-CSF versus G-CSF only: A single-center retrospective analysis.
Dill V; Blüm P; Lindemann A; Biederstädt A; Högner M; Götze KS; Bassermann F; Hildebrandt M
Transfusion; 2024 May; 64(5):871-880. PubMed ID: 38600674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, multicenter study on hematopoietic stemcell mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and 'on-demand' plerixafor in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents.
Mina R; Petrucci MT; Bonello F; Bongarzoni V; Saccardi R; Bertuglia G; Mengarelli A; Spadaro A; Lisi C; Curci P; Lemoli RM; Ballanti S; Floris R; Cupelli L; Tosi P; Olivieri A; Rota-Scalabrini D; Cangialosi C; Nozzoli C; Anaclerico B; Fazio F; Bruno B; Mancuso K; Corradini P; Milone G; Boccadoro M
Haematologica; 2024 May; 109(5):1525-1534. PubMed ID: 37981892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.
Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F
Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cyclophosphamide plus etoposide is a safe and effective mobilization regimen in patients with multiple myeloma.
Heider M; Grass S; Dill V; Rämisch S; Winter C; Verbeek M; Götze KS; Bassermann F; Jilg S
Transfus Apher Sci; 2021 Oct; 60(5):103197. PubMed ID: 34175195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Successful Mobilization of Autologous Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Stem Cells after Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients with Low CD34 Blood Cell Counts.
Holmberg LA; Linenberger M; Connelly-Smith L
Transplant Cell Ther; 2022 Nov; 28(11):754-759. PubMed ID: 36002104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Tuchman SA; Bacon WA; Huang LW; Long G; Rizzieri D; Horwitz M; Chute JP; Sullivan K; Morris Engemann A; Yopp A; Li Z; Corbet K; Chao N; Gasparetto C
J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 25293363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for multiple myeloma.
Shimura Y; Kuroda J; Uchiyama H; Kawata-Iida E; Tsutsumi Y; Nagoshi H; Mizutani S; Yamamoto-Sugitani M; Matsumoto Y; Kobayashi T; Horiike S; Shimazaki C; Kaneko H; Kobayashi Y; Taniwaki M
J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 23804501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are we choosing mobilization regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma wisely: A single center comparison of GCSF+/-plerixafor vs cyclophosphamide/GCSF+/-plerixafor.
Yang C; Dehghani M; Hopman W; Bhella S
J Clin Apher; 2022 Aug; 37(4):348-353. PubMed ID: 35218068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Additional plerixafor to granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation for autologous transplantation in people with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Hartmann T; Hübel K; Monsef I; Engert A; Skoetz N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Oct; 2015(10):CD010615. PubMed ID: 26484982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective comparison of mobilization methods for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Nakasone H; Kanda Y; Ueda T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu N; Minami J; Sakai R; Hagihara M; Yokota A; Oshima K; Tsukada Y; Tachibana T; Nakaseko C; Fujisawa S; Yano S; Fujita H; Takahashi S; Kanamori H; Okamoto S;
Am J Hematol; 2009 Dec; 84(12):809-14. PubMed ID: 19862826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy of upfront plerixafor + G-CSF versus placebo + G-CSF for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients ≥60 and <60 years of age with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; Stadtmauer EA; Bolwell BJ; Nademanee AP; Maziarz RT; Partisano AM; Marulkar S; DiPersio JF
Am J Hematol; 2013 Dec; 88(12):1017-23. PubMed ID: 23907769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
Sung AD; Grima DT; Bernard LM; Brown S; Carrum G; Holmberg L; Horwitz ME; Liesveld JL; Kanda J; McClune B; Shaughnessy P; Tricot GJ; Chao NJ
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Nov; 48(11):1444-9. PubMed ID: 23749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.
Nademanee AP; DiPersio JF; Maziarz RT; Stadtmauer EA; Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; Hsu FJ; Bridger G; Bolwell BJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Oct; 18(10):1564-72. PubMed ID: 22683613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Phase I Study of the Safety and Feasibility of Bortezomib in Combination With G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
Ghobadi A; Fiala MA; Rettig M; Schroeder M; Uy GL; Stockerl-Goldstein K; Westervelt P; Vij R; DiPersio JF
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2019 Oct; 19(10):e588-e593. PubMed ID: 31358485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing autologous stem cell collections for patients with multiple myeloma receiving G-CSF and Plerixafor: A single center project.
Javanbakht A; Stringer S; Anderson H; Hamilton E; Philip A; Waller EK; Langston AA; Joseph N; Roback JD; Schneider T; Sullivan HC; Hendrickson JE
J Clin Apher; 2024 Jun; 39(3):e22127. PubMed ID: 38803152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-dose etoposide is an effective and safe protocol for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Park Y; Kim DS; Jeon MJ; Lee BH; Yu ES; Kang KW; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Nam MH; Yoon SY; Choi CW; Kang ES; Cho D; Kim K; Kim BS; Kim DW; Kim SJ
J Clin Apher; 2019 Oct; 34(5):579-588. PubMed ID: 31283042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma.
Desikan KR; Barlogie B; Jagannath S; Vesole DH; Siegel D; Fassas A; Munshi N; Singhal S; Mehta J; Tindle S; Nelson J; Bracy D; Mattox S; Tricot G
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Apr; 16(4):1547-53. PubMed ID: 9552064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.
Johnsrud A; Ladha A; Muffly L; Shiraz P; Goldstein G; Osgood V; Shizuru JA; Johnston L; Arai S; Weng WK; Lowsky R; Rezvani AR; Meyer EH; Frank MJ; Negrin RS; Miklos DB; Sidana S
Transplant Cell Ther; 2021 Jul; 27(7):590.e1-590.e8. PubMed ID: 33915323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
