140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3860251)
1. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
Hurlburt CE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Dec; 52(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 6947192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evaluation of high-speed screen/film combinations in cephalometric radiography.
Kimura K; Langland OE; Biggerstaff RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 3479894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
Stirrups DR
Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptation of the Panorex II for use with rare earth screen-film combinations.
Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):645-8. PubMed ID: 3459997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths].
Bergonzini R; Gallini R; Giugni U; Robecchi D; Amato M
Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kodak T-Mat G film in rotational panoramic radiography.
Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 3459998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified inverse square sensitometry for the determination of the characteristic curve of radiographic screen/film systems.
Yoshida A; Hiraki Y; Ohkawa Y; Yamada T; Hashimoto K; Aono K
Acta Med Okayama; 1986 Feb; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3962729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of conventional and rare earth screen-film systems for cephalometric radiographs.
Kaugars GE; Fatouros P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 6950349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative microdensitometric study of various pairs of Kodak and Polaroid surface sensitive screens in teleradiography].
Le Denmat D; Pellerin Y
Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3866280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The lateral craniofacial cephalometric radiograph.
Precious DS; Miles DA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Aug; 45(8):737-8. PubMed ID: 3475449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
Tsiklakis K; Donta-Bakoyanni C; Tassopoulou M; Kamenopoulou V
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
