These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38602520)

  • 1. Investigating potential supply of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes through efficiency analysis.
    Leban V; Zadnik Stirn L; Pezdevšek Malovrh Š
    Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 74(2):161-179. PubMed ID: 38602520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China.
    Sun X; Yang P; Tao Y; Bian H
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149849. PubMed ID: 34455273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation.
    Chen J; Jiang B; Bai Y; Xu X; Alatalo JM
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 1):1426-1439. PubMed ID: 30308830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ecosystem services for regional spatial management.
    Yuan Y; Bai Z; Zhang J; Huang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116591. PubMed ID: 36419288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which pro-environmental farming behaviors should be priorities for funding? An approach based on matching ecosystem services (ESs) demand and supply.
    Song M; Jin G; Yan W
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 297():113368. PubMed ID: 34311255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A spatialized assessment of ecosystem service relationships in a multifunctional agroforestry landscape of Senegal.
    Leroux L; Clermont-Dauphin C; Ndienor M; Jourdan C; Roupsard O; Seghieri J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 853():158707. PubMed ID: 36099958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial heterogeneity and management challenges of ecosystem service trade-offs: a case study in Guangdong Province, China.
    Wu W; Zeng H; Guo C; You W; Xu H; Hu Y; Wang M; Liu X
    Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 73(2):378-394. PubMed ID: 37365302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecosystem service supply and demand across the conterminous United States: A multiscale analysis.
    Sun X; Tang H; Yang P; Hu G; Liu Z; Wu J
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 703():135005. PubMed ID: 31733497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nexus between indigenous ecological knowledge and ecosystem services: a socio-ecological analysis for sustainable ecosystem management.
    Das M; Das A; Seikh S; Pandey R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(41):61561-61578. PubMed ID: 34355327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity in the influence of landscape patterns on trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services: a case study of the Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi.
    Shi J; Liang X; Wei Z; Li H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(4):6144-6159. PubMed ID: 38147247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dynamic relationships between landscape structure and ecosystem services: An empirical analysis from the Wuhan metropolitan area, China.
    Ran P; Hu S; Frazier AE; Yang S; Song X; Qu S
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt B):116575. PubMed ID: 36308968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing cover of natural areas at smaller scales can improve the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecological mosaic landscapes.
    Rosenfield MF; Miedema Brown L; Anand M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114248. PubMed ID: 34896857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The paradoxical need for human intervention in the conservation of natural environments in Venice lagoon.
    Stocco A; Pranovi F
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6798. PubMed ID: 37100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping the functional connectivity of ecosystem services supply across a regional landscape.
    Field RD; Parrott L
    Elife; 2022 Feb; 11():. PubMed ID: 35175193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Land use trade-offs in China's protected areas from the perspective of accounting values of ecosystem services.
    Chen H; Costanza R; Kubiszewski I
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115178. PubMed ID: 35504187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing bioenergy production sites in the Southeastern US regarding ecosystem service supply and demand.
    Meyer MA; Chand T; Priess JA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0116336. PubMed ID: 25768660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying key areas of imbalanced supply and demand of ecosystem services at the urban agglomeration scale: A case study of the Fujian Delta in China.
    Xin R; Skov-Petersen H; Zeng J; Zhou J; Li K; Hu J; Liu X; Kong J; Wang Q
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 791():148173. PubMed ID: 34118666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating supply-demand matching of ecosystem services considering water-energy-food nexus and synergies/trade-offs in the Hangzhou of China.
    Ding T; Chen J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(19):54568-54585. PubMed ID: 36877392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing multifunctionality in European boreal forests: The potential role of Triad landscape functional zoning.
    Blattert C; Eyvindson K; Mönkkönen M; Raatikainen KJ; Triviño M; Duflot R
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119250. PubMed ID: 37864945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing risks by transforming landscapes: Cross-scale effects of land-use changes on ecosystem services.
    Fedele G; Locatelli B; Djoudi H; Colloff MJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195895. PubMed ID: 29689062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.