These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38602788)

  • 1. Cognitive effects and correlates of reading fiction: Two preregistered multilevel meta-analyses.
    Wimmer L; Currie G; Friend S; Wittwer J; Ferguson HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1464-1488. PubMed ID: 38602788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis.
    Dodell-Feder D; Tamir DI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Nov; 147(11):1713-1727. PubMed ID: 29481102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication.
    Panero ME; Weisberg DS; Black J; Goldstein TR; Barnes JL; Brownell H; Winner E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Nov; 111(5):e46-e54. PubMed ID: 27642659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of "Literary Fiction" to Promote Mentalizing Ability.
    Pino MC; Mazza M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160254. PubMed ID: 27490164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication": Correction to Panero et al. (2016).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Nov; 111(5):e55. PubMed ID: 27762576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is reading fiction associated with a higher mind-reading ability? Two conceptual replication studies in Japan.
    Takahashi Y; Himichi T; Masuchi A; Nakanishi D; Ohtsubo Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287542. PubMed ID: 37347739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind.
    Kidd DC; Castano E
    Science; 2013 Oct; 342(6156):377-80. PubMed ID: 24091705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network.
    Tamir DI; Bricker AB; Dodell-Feder D; Mitchell JP
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 11(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 26342221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading fiction and reading minds in early adolescence: A longitudinal study.
    van der Kleij SW; Apperly I; Shapiro LR; Ricketts J; Devine RT
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Oct; 222():105476. PubMed ID: 35709569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation.
    Bal PM; Veltkamp M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e55341. PubMed ID: 23383160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the validity of a self-report scale, author recognition test, and book counting as measures of lifetime exposure to print fiction.
    Wimmer L; Ferguson HJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jan; 55(1):103-134. PubMed ID: 35277842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind.
    Schurz M; Radua J; Tholen MG; Maliske L; Margulies DS; Mars RB; Sallet J; Kanske P
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Mar; 147(3):293-327. PubMed ID: 33151703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a brief exposure to literary fiction improve social ability? Assessing the evidential value of published studies with a p-curve.
    Quinlan JA; Padgett JK; Khajehnassiri A; Mar RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Mar; 152(3):723-732. PubMed ID: 36265034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cognitive science of fiction.
    Oatley K
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2012 Jul; 3(4):425-430. PubMed ID: 26301527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of exposure to fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy in social perception.
    Castano E; Martingano AJ; Perconti P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233378. PubMed ID: 32470005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are self-report cognitive empathy ratings valid proxies for cognitive empathy ability? Negligible meta-analytic relations with behavioral task performance.
    Murphy BA; Lilienfeld SO
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1062-1072. PubMed ID: 31120296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review.
    Dietrichson J; Filges T; Seerup JK; Klokker RH; Viinholt BCA; Bøg M; Eiberg M
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 17(2):e1152. PubMed ID: 37131926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose.
    Lindeman M; Svedholm-Häkkinen AM; Lipsanen J
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():63-76. PubMed ID: 25460380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.