These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38603640)
1. Who supports Bernie? Analyzing identity and ideological variation on Twitter during the 2020 democratic primaries. Shuster SM; Campos-Castillo C; Madani N; Joseph K PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0294735. PubMed ID: 38603640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results. Correa JC; Camargo JE Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Jan; 20(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28080152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From an election to an insurrection: Investigating differential engagement and sentiment in the #defundthepolice and #defendthepolice network on Twitter. Wirth B; Evans M PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0289041. PubMed ID: 38512941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Social Media Activism and Convergence in Tweet Topics After the Initial #MeToo Movement for Two Distinct Groups of Twitter Users. Baik JM; Nyein TH; Modrek S J Interpers Violence; 2022 Aug; 37(15-16):NP13603-NP13622. PubMed ID: 33840303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election. Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Twitter use in scientific communication revealed by visualization of information spreading by influencers within half a year after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. Tsubokura M; Onoue Y; Torii HA; Suda S; Mori K; Nishikawa Y; Ozaki A; Uno K PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203594. PubMed ID: 30192829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of Twitter Activity and Engagement From Annual Meetings of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the Society of Interventional Radiology. Suh D; Yoon W; Lavingia KS; Amendola MF Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 76():481-487. PubMed ID: 33831529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? Barberá P; Jost JT; Nagler J; Tucker JA; Bonneau R Psychol Sci; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1531-42. PubMed ID: 26297377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examining Tweet Content and Engagement of Canadian Public Health Agencies and Decision Makers During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis. Slavik CE; Buttle C; Sturrock SL; Darlington JC; Yiannakoulias N J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e24883. PubMed ID: 33651705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ratioing the President: An exploration of public engagement with Obama and Trump on Twitter. Minot JR; Arnold MV; Alshaabi T; Danforth CM; Dodds PS PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0248880. PubMed ID: 33852612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter. Gaisbauer F; Pournaki A; Banisch S; Olbrich E PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0249241. PubMed ID: 33765104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brands with personalities - good for businesses, but bad for public health? A content analysis of how food and beverage brands personify themselves on Twitter. Greene T; Seet C; Rodríguez Barrio A; McIntyre D; Kelly B; Bragg MA Public Health Nutr; 2022 Jan; 25(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 33820575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election. Mohammadi S; Moradi P; Firouzabadi SM; Jafari G PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270822. PubMed ID: 35900976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social media mining for birth defects research: A rule-based, bootstrapping approach to collecting data for rare health-related events on Twitter. Klein AZ; Sarker A; Cai H; Weissenbacher D; Gonzalez-Hernandez G J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():68-78. PubMed ID: 30292855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election. Gaumont N; Panahi M; Chavalarias D PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0201879. PubMed ID: 30231018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017. Bail CA; Guay B; Maloney E; Combs A; Hillygus DS; Merhout F; Freelon D; Volfovsky A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(1):243-250. PubMed ID: 31767743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tweets Related to Motivation and Physical Activity for Obesity-Related Behavior Change: Descriptive Analysis. Park A J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jul; 24(7):e15055. PubMed ID: 35857347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How did Ebola information spread on twitter: broadcasting or viral spreading? Liang H; Fung IC; Tse ZTH; Yin J; Chan CH; Pechta LE; Smith BJ; Marquez-Lameda RD; Meltzer MI; Lubell KM; Fu KW BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):438. PubMed ID: 31023299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ideological asymmetries in online hostility, intimidation, obscenity, and prejudice. Badaan V; Hoffarth M; Roper C; Parker T; Jost JT Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22345. PubMed ID: 38102130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Driving the Popularity and Virality of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse on Twitter: Text Mining and Data Visualization Study. Zhang J; Wang Y; Shi M; Wang X JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Dec; 7(12):e32814. PubMed ID: 34665761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]