125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38604390)
1. The Purpose of Journal Peer Review Is to Make Articles Better.
Lubowitz JH; Rossi MJ; Matzkin E
Arthroscopy; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1955. PubMed ID: 38604390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medwaves editorial history, policies and guidelines: 3. Section policies.
Bachelet VC
Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6910. PubMed ID: 28430764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The hidden work of a journal editor.
Kearney MH
Res Nurs Health; 2018 Feb; 41(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 29360181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medwaves editorial history, policies and guidelines: 2. Editorial policies.
Bachelet VC
Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6909. PubMed ID: 28430770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Improvement and decision-making process of an article].
Matías-Guiu J; García Ramos R
Neurologia; 2009; 24(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 19798600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Baishideng's century goal: editing and publishing high-quality articles.
Ma LS
World J Gastroenterol; 2009 Aug; 15(31):3841-4. PubMed ID: 19701962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consultative review is worth the wait.
King SR
Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28954691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An audit of the editorial process at the
Fernandes GJ; Pai SA
Indian J Cancer; 2021; 58(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 34100409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer Review and Medical Journals.
Nugent K; Peterson CJ
J Prim Care Community Health; 2024; 15():21501319241252235. PubMed ID: 38682542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance?
Weiner BK; Weiner JP; Smith HE
Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 20207330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Editors' Best of 2019.
Novins DK; Althoff RR; Cortese S; Drury SS; Frazier JA; Henderson SW; McCauley E; White TJH
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2020 Jan; 59(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 31879011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.
Flanagin A; Carey LA; Fontanarosa PB; Phillips SG; Pace BP; Lundberg GD; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9676661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The peer review process of the Journal.
White MC
Am J Infect Control; 1993 Dec; 21(6):279-82. PubMed ID: 8122798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent non-cited overlap between two published articles by the same group of authors.
Cardiology; 2010; 117(3):197. PubMed ID: 21252533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Predatory Journals: What Nurse Educators Need to Know.
Fitzpatrick JJ
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(1):7. PubMed ID: 29194149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
Downer M
Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices.
Happe LE
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2020 Aug; 26(8):956-960. PubMed ID: 32715959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
