173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38607585)
1. Two-row, three-row or powered circular stapler, which to choose when performing colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Martín-Arévalo J; Pla-Martí V; Huntley D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Izquierdo-Moreno A; Garzón-Hernández LP; Garcés-Albir M; Espí-Macías A; Moro-Valdezate D
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2024 Apr; 39(1):51. PubMed ID: 38607585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary evaluation of two-row versus three-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Quero G; Fiorillo C; Menghi R; Rosa F; Massimiani G; Schena CA; De Sio D; Laterza V; Lucinato C; Papa V; Tondolo V; Alfieri S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2501-2510. PubMed ID: 36385574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.
Herzig DO; Ogilvie JW; Chudzinski A; Ferrara A; Ashraf SQ; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Van der Speeten K; Kinross J; Schimmelpenning H; Sagar PM; Cannon JA; Schwiers ML; Singleton DW; Waggoner JR; Fryrear R; Sylla P
Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():140-146. PubMed ID: 33176211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence, predictors, and economic burden of circular anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal reconstructions involving manual circular staplers.
Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Chaudhuri R; Fryrear R; Roy S
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):255-265. PubMed ID: 33576292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis.
Atallah S; Kural S; Banda N; Banda A; Bawaney F; Cabral F; Neychev V; Patel C; Larach S
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 May; 24(5):479-486. PubMed ID: 32193667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K
BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome.
Pines G; Buyeviz V; Machlenkin S; Klein Y; Laor A; Kashtan H
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 19431220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience.
Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G
Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of a new triple-row circular stapler in reducing the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A historical control and propensity score-matched study.
Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Fukushima N; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(27):e29325. PubMed ID: 35801763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear Stapler versus Circular Stapler for Patients Undergoing Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Gastric Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
Jin T; Liu HD; Chen ZH; Hu JK; Yang K
J Invest Surg; 2022 Jul; 35(7):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 35435081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?
Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
